EAGE Workshop on Geomechanics in the Oil and Gas Industry 2014
DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.20140444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating Rock Strength From Non-Destructive Strength Testing (EQUOTIP) and Related Benefits

Abstract: The results indicate that a strong correlation exists between Equotip Leeb hardness and UCS derived from scratch-test data for different lithologies. Tests on full cores also fit into the correlation. Larger variations in data range were encountered in coarse-grained sandstones, sandstones characterized by high amounts of clay minerals and fines as well as in lithologies that exhibit high rock strengths. Further in-house research is planned to find individual correlations or other testing devices for those lit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The single impacts method involves the firing of multiple randomly located single impacts across the sample surface (Verwaal & Mulder, 1993) and taking the calculated mean average of these individual impact values as the characteristic hardness. This method has been applied to a number of studies using the Equotip to evaluate rock properties (e.g., Verwaal & Mulder, 1993;Matsukura, 2007 andFeal-Pérez & Blanco-Chao, 2012;Coombes et al, 2013;Hujer et al, 2014;Asiri et al, 2016). Although no standardised number of impacts has been established, the single impact method allows for the natural heterogeneity of the rock mass to be incorporated into the result.…”
Section: Equotip Rebound Hardness Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The single impacts method involves the firing of multiple randomly located single impacts across the sample surface (Verwaal & Mulder, 1993) and taking the calculated mean average of these individual impact values as the characteristic hardness. This method has been applied to a number of studies using the Equotip to evaluate rock properties (e.g., Verwaal & Mulder, 1993;Matsukura, 2007 andFeal-Pérez & Blanco-Chao, 2012;Coombes et al, 2013;Hujer et al, 2014;Asiri et al, 2016). Although no standardised number of impacts has been established, the single impact method allows for the natural heterogeneity of the rock mass to be incorporated into the result.…”
Section: Equotip Rebound Hardness Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[26][27][28] Likewise, existing research shows accurate correlations between Leeb hardness and UCS. [29][30][31][32][33] Therefore, Leeb hardness was selected as the surface rock hardness technique to estimate UCS. Rebound hardness techniques are sensitive to rock surface properties, including superficial alterations, superficial crusts, etc., which can interfere in the estimation of UCS of the whole sample.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%