2018
DOI: 10.1063/1.5018252
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating single molecule conductance from spontaneous evolution of a molecular contact

Abstract: We present an original method to estimate the conductivity of a single molecule anchored to nanometric-sized metallic electrodes, using a Mechanically Controlled Break Junction (MCBJ) operated at room temperature in liquid. We record the conductance through the metal / molecules / metal nanocontact while keeping the metallic electrodes at a fixed distance. Taking advantage of thermal diffusion and electromigration, we let the contact naturally explore the more stable configurations around a chosen conductance … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The multiple-peak structure for ADT was reproduced by several other groups; the full dataset is available in the Su et al (2015), and Gil et al (2018). The spread in the data is large, but the systematic trends in the separate works are shown by connecting the data points obtained from three works, namely, Ulrich et al (2006), the H peak from , and the H peak from Haiss et al (2009).…”
Section: Alkanedithiolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The multiple-peak structure for ADT was reproduced by several other groups; the full dataset is available in the Su et al (2015), and Gil et al (2018). The spread in the data is large, but the systematic trends in the separate works are shown by connecting the data points obtained from three works, namely, Ulrich et al (2006), the H peak from , and the H peak from Haiss et al (2009).…”
Section: Alkanedithiolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Histograms that show only a single peak and for which the identification in terms of these three categories is not discussed are shown as gray bullets. The data include published work from Cui et al (2001), Xu and Tao (2003), Xu, Xiao, and Tao (2003), Haiss et al (2004, 2009)Chen et al (2006), González et al (2006), He et al (2006), Jang et al (2006), Li et al (2006, 2008), Sek et al (2006), Ulrich et al (2006), Wierzbinski and Slowinski (2006), Huang et al (2007), Nishikawa et al (2007), Park et al (2007), Hihath et al (2008), Huisman et al (2008), Kiguchi, Sekiguchi, and Murakoshi (2008), Xia, Diez-Perez, and Tao (2008), Song et al (2009, 2010)Martin (2010), Arroyo et al (2011), Kim, Hellmuth et al (2011), Kim, Song et al (2011), Rascón-Ramos et al (2015),Su et al (2015), andGil et al (2018). The spread in the data is large, but the systematic trends in the separate works are shown by connecting the data points obtained from three works, namely,Ulrich et al (2006), the H peak from, and the H peak fromHaiss et al (2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current histograms and single molecule conductance are extracted from these measurements as reported in Ref. 56 and detailed in the supporting information.…”
Section: Mechanically Controlled Break Junction (Mcbj)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the main benefits of the measurement and analysis method used here, lies in eliminating the constant (or slowly varying) tunneling or ionic contribution to the net conductance. 56 In these conditions, it makes sense to compare conductance values of protonated and neutral molecules. Table 3 gathers the conductance values obtained for neutral and protonated molecules B at Vbias = 35, 70 and 140 mV (see supporting information, figures S14-S16 given the corresponding current traces and histograms of currents and figure S17 for the GMOL vs.…”
Section: Single Molecule Conductance Measurements By Mcbjmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation