2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating soil organic carbon stock change at multiple scales using machine learning and multivariate geostatistics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If we compare the uncertainty of point-support predictions (Figure 5) with the uncertainty of spatial averages (Table 4, numbers in square brackets), it can be seen that the uncertainty associated with the spatial average is smaller. This can be attributed to the fact that negative and positive interpolation errors partially cancel out when values are aggregated, a phenomenon wellknown in geostatistics [26,39,52]. We should also highlight that in the Keszthely basin the prediction uncertainty of spatial averages is the highest for the N content and for the N:P ratio.…”
Section: Spatial Aggregationmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…If we compare the uncertainty of point-support predictions (Figure 5) with the uncertainty of spatial averages (Table 4, numbers in square brackets), it can be seen that the uncertainty associated with the spatial average is smaller. This can be attributed to the fact that negative and positive interpolation errors partially cancel out when values are aggregated, a phenomenon wellknown in geostatistics [26,39,52]. We should also highlight that in the Keszthely basin the prediction uncertainty of spatial averages is the highest for the N content and for the N:P ratio.…”
Section: Spatial Aggregationmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Although it is also an attractive feature of multivariate geostatistics, it is still rarely exploited in practice. In addition, Szatmári et al [39] pointed out that an approach that does not account for the spatial cross-correlation between the variables under study will fail to characterize the uncertainty about the derived variable reliably.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Once the quality of map predictions has been assessed, a possible avenue to reduce the uncertainty is to predict over larger spatial supports, which have a long history in geostatistics in the form of block kriging (Burgess & Webster, 1980). A recent example of this is Szatmári et al (2021) who combined machine learning and geostatistics to predict change in carbon stocks for Hungary at spatial supports of point, 1 and 10 km – block, county and country level. Recent work by Bishop et al (2015) empirically demonstrated the reduction in uncertainty with increasing spatial support.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%