1967
DOI: 10.2307/3798363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating Squirrel Abundance from Livetrapping Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

1970
1970
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This method was used by Edwards & Eberh a r d t (1967) to estimate a known experimental cottontail rabbit population; with the exception of the Lincoln index, other methods tended to over or underestimate the number of individuals present. Nixon et al (1967) working with two species of tree squirrels, also found that linear regression estimates closely approximated those obtained with the Lincoln index, whereas other methods produced poor fits and much lower values. The assumptions of the regression method are similar to those for the Petersen index, as described previously.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…This method was used by Edwards & Eberh a r d t (1967) to estimate a known experimental cottontail rabbit population; with the exception of the Lincoln index, other methods tended to over or underestimate the number of individuals present. Nixon et al (1967) working with two species of tree squirrels, also found that linear regression estimates closely approximated those obtained with the Lincoln index, whereas other methods produced poor fits and much lower values. The assumptions of the regression method are similar to those for the Petersen index, as described previously.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The former two (of which the Geometric is a special case of the Negative Binomial) are founded on a model of heterogeneity in p deriving from unequal trap access. Although these methods have been justified on theoretical grounds (Eberhardt, Peterle & Schofield, 1963;Gates & Smith, 1972) support for them comes largely from goodness-of-fit tests and empirical evaluation Nixon et al, 1967;Tanton, 1965). Cormack (1979) and Seber (1982) concur that these methods should be regarded as statistical descriptions which might be generated by various, quite different, models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A good deal of caution is therefore necessary in applying zero-truncated distributions to estimate population size. This is of particular relevance to grey squirrel studies, since Nixon et al (1967) have recommended the Geometric method for this species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otis et al (1978) and White et al (1982) discuss problems and procedures for estimating abundance from capture data. We conclude from our data that probability of capture of fox squirrels varies (is heterogeneous) among individuals, among occasions, and that it changes after the first capture-a response similar to that noted for gray squirrels (Nixon et al 1967;Bouffard and Hein 1978). We compared seasonal changes in trapping efficiency (marked capturelmarked known available) for marked squirrels known to be alive.…”
Section: Trapping Periodsmentioning
confidence: 62%