1995
DOI: 10.1016/0079-6816(95)00039-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating surface diffusion coefficients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
110
4

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 342 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 251 publications
6
110
4
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in agreement with the fast diffusion of CO on platinum (111) terraces under UHV conditions with a typical hopping rate in the order of 10 5 s -1 at 195 K and low CO coverage [19][20][21] and 10 7 s -1 at 300 K and CO coverage of 0.67 M [22]. From reviewing over 500 systems Seebauer et al concluded an apparent insensitivity of diffusional parameters to the presence of an aqueous ambient [23], which suggests that a high hopping rate of CO should be expected under electrochemical conditions as well. Having determined the apparent rate constant k of CO oxidation and taking into account the requirements for k/D for the mean field approximation to be valid, we have estimated the diffusion coefficient D for CO on (111) terraces to be higher than 10 -11 cm 2 /s [10].…”
Section: Co Electrooxidation On Ptsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…This is in agreement with the fast diffusion of CO on platinum (111) terraces under UHV conditions with a typical hopping rate in the order of 10 5 s -1 at 195 K and low CO coverage [19][20][21] and 10 7 s -1 at 300 K and CO coverage of 0.67 M [22]. From reviewing over 500 systems Seebauer et al concluded an apparent insensitivity of diffusional parameters to the presence of an aqueous ambient [23], which suggests that a high hopping rate of CO should be expected under electrochemical conditions as well. Having determined the apparent rate constant k of CO oxidation and taking into account the requirements for k/D for the mean field approximation to be valid, we have estimated the diffusion coefficient D for CO on (111) terraces to be higher than 10 -11 cm 2 /s [10].…”
Section: Co Electrooxidation On Ptsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Atomic diffusion has been studied for a long time as one of the fundamental processes governing the surface physics [1][2][3][4][5][6]. For example, the diffusion of atoms is responsible for epitaxial growth of atomic layers, formation of islands, chains, and other nanostructures or chemical reactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note, however, that the maximum rates of surface diffusion and reaction may substantially deviate from the bulk-derived estimates depending on the reaction system and conditions. 62,63 Levoglucosan and abietic acid substrates were exposed under dry conditions to OH in the presence of O 2 using a coated-wall flow-tube reactor coupled to a chemical ionization mass spectrometer as described in detail previously. 29 In brief, OH radicals were produced via a microwave discharge of H 2 in a He carrier flow followed by reaction with O 2 in a movable halocarbon wax-coated glass injector.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%