Estimating surface melt in Antarctica from 1979 to 2022, using a statistically parameterized positive degree-day model

Abstract

Abstract. Surface melt is one of the primary drivers of ice shelf collapse in Antarctica. Surface melting is expected to increase in the future as the global climate continues to warm, because there is a statistically significant positive relationship between air temperature and melt. Enhanced surface melt will negatively impact the mass balance of the Antarctic Ice Sheet (AIS) and, through dynamic feedbacks, induce changes in global mean sea level (GMSL). However, current understanding of surface melt in Antarctica remains limited in past, present or future contexts. Continental-scale spaceborne observations of surface melt are limited to the satellite era (1979–present), meaning that current estimates of Antarctic surface melt are typically derived from surface energy balance (SEB) or positive degree-day (PDD) models. SEB models require diverse and detailed input data that are not always available and require considerable computational resources. The PDD model, by comparison, has fewer input and computational requirements and is therefor suited for exploring surface melt scenarios in the past and future. The use of PDD schemes for Antarctic melt has been less extensively explored than their application to surface melting of the Greenland Ice Sheet, particularly in terms of a spatially-varying parameterization. Here, we construct a PDD model, force it only with 2-m air temperature reanalysis data, and parameterize it by minimizing the error with respect to satellite observations and SEB model outputs over the period 1979 to 2022. We compare the spatial and temporal variability of surface melt from our PDD model over the last 43 years with that of satellite observations and SEB simulations. We find that the PDD model can generally capture the same spatial and temporal surface melt patterns. Although there were at most four years over/under- estimation on ice shelf regions in the epoch, these discrepancies reduce when considering the whole AIS. With the limitations discussed, we suggest that an appropriately parameterized PDD model can be a valuable tool for exploring Antarctic surface melt beyond the satellite era.

Continent-scale mapping reveals a rise in East Antarctic surface meltwater

“…5a). Additionally, we do not observe a close association between monthly Positive Degree Days (PDDsa measure of above-freezing air temperatures) and surface meltwater area, consistent with research that found no trend in EAIS surface melting over recent decades 34 . On a multi-annual scale, therefore, there is no clear climatic driver for the increasing trend in EAIS meltwater area.…”

Barriers to people's participation in watershed intervention projects: perspectives of experts and local communities

“…The two-sample KS test evaluates the distance between the empirical distribution functions derived from two different samples of data (Lanzante 2021;Moustakis et al 2022). Given its nonparametric nature, this method avoids assumptions about the distribution of the samples (Zheng et al 2022).…”

Changes in the Antarctic’s Summer Surface Albedo, Observed by Satellite since 1982 and Associated with Sea Ice Anomalies

“…This melting dataset provides the daily status of dry and wet snow at each grid pixel within the range, which is used to detect the days and regions where melting occurred. They are determined by the different dielectric constants of dry and wet snow, distinguished by the variation of upwelling microwave brightness temperature [52]. This dataset spans from April 1979 to March 2021 and has a spatial resolution of 25 km with a stereographic polar grid.…”