Modern biology is a treasure trove of data. With all this data, it is helpful to have analytical tools that are applicable regardless of context. One type of data that needs more quantitative analytical tools is particulate trajectories. This type of data appears in many different contexts and across scales in biology: from inferring statistics of a bacteria performing chemotaxis to the mobility of ms2 spots within nuclei. Presently, most analyses performed on data of this nature has been limited to mean square displacement (MSD) analyses. While simple, MSD analysis has several pitfalls, including difficulty in selecting between competing models, how to handle systems with multiple distinct sub-populations, and parameter extraction from limited time-series data sets. Here, we provide an alternative to MSD analysis using the jump distance distribution (JDD) [1,2]. The JDD resolves several issues: one can select between competing models of motion, have composite models that allow for multiple populations, and have improved error bounds on parameter estimates when data is limited. A major consequence is that you can perform analyses using a fraction of the data required to get similar results using MSD analyses, thereby giving access to a larger range of temporal dynamics when the underlying stochastic process is not stationary. In this paper, we construct and validate a derivation of the JDD for different transport models, explore the dependence on dimensionality of the process (1-3 dimensions), and implement a parameter estimation and model selection scheme. Finally, we discuss extensions of our scheme and its applications to biological data.
Author summaryMean square displacement (MSD) analyses have been the standard for analyzing particulate trajectories, where its shortcomings have been overlooked in light of its simplicity. The Jump Distance Distribution (JDD) has been proposed by others in the past as a new way to analyze particulate trajectories, but has not been sufficiently analyzed in varying numbers of dimensions or given a robust analysis on performance and how it compares to MSD analysis. We present the forms of the JDD in 1, 2, and 3 dimensions for three different models for transport: pure diffusion, directed diffusion, and anomalous diffusion. We also discuss how to select between competing models, and verify our method with a rigorous analysis. Through this, we have a method that is superior to a MSD analysis. This method works across a wide range of parameters, which should make it broadly applicable to any system where the underlying motion is stochastic.