2015
DOI: 10.1038/srep11306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating the anomalous diffusion exponent for single particle tracking data with measurement errors - An alternative approach

Abstract: Accurately characterizing the anomalous diffusion of a tracer particle has become a central issue in biophysics. However, measurement errors raise difficulty in the characterization of single trajectories, which is usually performed through the time-averaged mean square displacement (TAMSD). In this paper, we study a fractionally integrated moving average (FIMA) process as an appropriate model for anomalous diffusion data with measurement errors. We compare FIMA and traditional TAMSD estimators for the anomalo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
76
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
1
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…proposed to accurately estimate this exponent for single trajectories [7,8] in the presence of experimental limitations, such as optical diffraction and the finite length of the trajectory.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…proposed to accurately estimate this exponent for single trajectories [7,8] in the presence of experimental limitations, such as optical diffraction and the finite length of the trajectory.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this scenario, determining whether a single-molecule trajectory (or a short segment of it) displays normal or anomalous behavior by its tMSD scaling exponent and associating the motion to a specific physical model are elements of paramount importance to gain insight about the biophysical mechanism underlying anomalous diffusion, thus providing a detailed picture of a variety of phenomena. Recent works in this direction have focused on classification schemes based on optimization procedures [8], power spectral density [25], or Bayesian approaches [26,27].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pitfalls of MSD analysis, particularly with biological data(see Results and Discussion for examples), include the requirement for many data points (12), difficulties in selecting between competing models (13), difficulties with handling systems with two distinct subpopulations (12,14), and the relatively large errors in cases when trajectories are short. Several studies have tried to improve and expand upon MSD analysis, and also have proposed new methods of extracting models and parameters (12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19).…”
Section: Mean Squared Displacementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For normal diffusion (i.e., pure Brownian motion), = 1, while for anomalous diffusion, the MSD can be subdiffusive ( < 1), or superdiffusive ( > 1), ( Fig. 1) (14,15).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, using only the first two time lags of the MSD curve to determine the diffusion coefficient in pure Brownian trajectories was shown to be preferable under most conditions because it was more robust to noise (18). To the best of our knowledge, identifying the optimal approach for the relevant parameters describing subdiffusive motion has not yet been investigated, despite the known inaccuracies of applying traditional methods to deficient datasets (14,15). Of particular interest is how to make use of short trajectories to accurately extract subdiffusive parameters, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%