2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-33783-8_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating the Biasing Effect of Behavioural Patterns on Mobile Fitness App Data by Density-Based Clustering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, users who contribute SVI data may unintentionally compromise personal information by repeatedly collecting data along routine commuting routes (e.g., [83]). Other issues of concern include the quality of VSVI data from different sources, the availability of relevant assessment methods [84], location spoofing [85], the uploading of fake data [86] and issues with participation inequality [87,88]; however, these could be overcome as the number and diversity of contributors and data sources increase. In order to advance our understanding of VSVI in light of these issues, and in particular with respect to data trustworthiness and quality, we suggest that additional research that focuses specifically on spatial and temporal user contribution patterns is needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, users who contribute SVI data may unintentionally compromise personal information by repeatedly collecting data along routine commuting routes (e.g., [83]). Other issues of concern include the quality of VSVI data from different sources, the availability of relevant assessment methods [84], location spoofing [85], the uploading of fake data [86] and issues with participation inequality [87,88]; however, these could be overcome as the number and diversity of contributors and data sources increase. In order to advance our understanding of VSVI in light of these issues, and in particular with respect to data trustworthiness and quality, we suggest that additional research that focuses specifically on spatial and temporal user contribution patterns is needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As they are present in both the datasets, superusers influencing the results and acting as the differentiating factor between the two cities seems highly unlikely. While user bias can produce misleading results [4], it is important to note the context of the study, which in this case, is heuristic choice popularity distribution, and not popularity of any specific route or street segment. In relevance to this study, there could be cases where super-users, by recording their weekday walking trips using the same route (and thus the same heuristic), influence one heuristic greatly than others.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Smartphone mapping applications such as Google Maps, Waze, Uber, and related technologies create tremendous privacy challenges with personal data behind proprietary algorithms, and also contribute great prospects for understanding travel at high resolution over broad geographies (Weidemann et al 2018). Planners use fitness app data to understand cycling routes, but studies have shown that big data sources provide only a segment of the population, varying significantly from survey data using traditional sampling methods (Bergman and Oksanen 2016a). Similarly, comparisons of several big data sources on the same routes show significant differences, representing a fraction of total travel (Griffin and Jiao 2015a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%