2015 41st Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications 2015
DOI: 10.1109/seaa.2015.18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating the Cost and Benefit of Model-Based Testing: A Decision Support Procedure for the Application of Model-Based Testing in Industry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We carefully identified and addressed potential threats to validity at every step of this MLR study. We followed the guidelines for performing SLRs and benefited from our previous experience, e.g., (Doğan et al 2014;Garousi et al 2015;Zhi et al 2015;Häser et al 2014;Mohacsi et al 2015;Catal and Diri 2009;Tarhan and Giray 2017;Giray and Tuzun 2018). This sub-section discusses the potential threats to validity and the actions we took to minimize or mitigate them.…”
Section: Potential Threats To Validity Of the Mlrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We carefully identified and addressed potential threats to validity at every step of this MLR study. We followed the guidelines for performing SLRs and benefited from our previous experience, e.g., (Doğan et al 2014;Garousi et al 2015;Zhi et al 2015;Häser et al 2014;Mohacsi et al 2015;Catal and Diri 2009;Tarhan and Giray 2017;Giray and Tuzun 2018). This sub-section discusses the potential threats to validity and the actions we took to minimize or mitigate them.…”
Section: Potential Threats To Validity Of the Mlrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, a lack of cost-benefit analysis in most research papers, i.e., how much effort/time has to be spent to adopt/implement a testing technique in a project and how much real cost savings will be yielded as a result, is highlighted as a major limitation of research ideas by practitioners. The authors have had some initial success in conducting cost-benefit analysis of testing techniques in their joint IACs with partners, e.g., [8][9][10].…”
Section: Analysis Goal and Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we present a comparison of time required to execute test cases manually and using ContextDrive. Mohacsi et al [30] reported time required to develop different testing artifacts including manual test case execution time and automated test case execution. Authors reported that on average 3 4 hour are required to execute a test case manually in which about 100 individual data checks need to be performed.…”
Section: ) Time Comparison Of Executing Test Scenario In Contextdrive Vs Manual Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%