2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2019.03.1635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating the cost of quality of errors in the analytical phase

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The CoQ measurement can be applied in different laboratories (Elbireer et al, 2010), water utility organizations (Banasik and Beruvides, 2012), a singleproduct three-echelon serial supply chain (Castillo-Villar et al, 2012), organizations regardless of size, and whether for profit or nonprofit (Ozkan and Karaibrahimoglu, 2013), construction projects (Jafari and Rodchua, 2014;Mahmood et al, 2014), industries (Prashar, 2014;Malik et al, 2016), manufacturing companies (Kerfai et al, 2016;Pattanayak et al, 2019), foundries (Acharya and Vadher, 2016), the service sector (Malik et al, 2016;Duarte et al, 2018), the banking sector (Duarte et al, 2018), quality-oriented companies (Chatzipetrou and Moschidis, 2018), food companies (Psomas et al, 2018), garment organizations (Ferdousi et al, 2019) and in several types of activities (processes) (Pattanayak et al, 2019;Schmidt and Pearson, 2019) (continued ) Dimitrantzou et al (2020) conducting a SLR study in the field of CoQ. These findings are also compatible with those obtained in previous literature reviews in the field of TQM (Manatos et al, 2017;Bajaj et al, 2018;Nasim, 2018).…”
Section: Business Sectors Measuring Coqmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The CoQ measurement can be applied in different laboratories (Elbireer et al, 2010), water utility organizations (Banasik and Beruvides, 2012), a singleproduct three-echelon serial supply chain (Castillo-Villar et al, 2012), organizations regardless of size, and whether for profit or nonprofit (Ozkan and Karaibrahimoglu, 2013), construction projects (Jafari and Rodchua, 2014;Mahmood et al, 2014), industries (Prashar, 2014;Malik et al, 2016), manufacturing companies (Kerfai et al, 2016;Pattanayak et al, 2019), foundries (Acharya and Vadher, 2016), the service sector (Malik et al, 2016;Duarte et al, 2018), the banking sector (Duarte et al, 2018), quality-oriented companies (Chatzipetrou and Moschidis, 2018), food companies (Psomas et al, 2018), garment organizations (Ferdousi et al, 2019) and in several types of activities (processes) (Pattanayak et al, 2019;Schmidt and Pearson, 2019) (continued ) Dimitrantzou et al (2020) conducting a SLR study in the field of CoQ. These findings are also compatible with those obtained in previous literature reviews in the field of TQM (Manatos et al, 2017;Bajaj et al, 2018;Nasim, 2018).…”
Section: Business Sectors Measuring Coqmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Understanding the importance of prevention vs failure costs (Alzaman et al, 2010); identifying the hidden quality costs (Cheah et al, 2011) and the failure activities or the impactful prevention programs (Banasik and Beruvides, 2012); optimizing the values of prevention and appraisal costs (Chopra and Singh, 2015); enhancing investments in prevention and appraisal actions (Kerfai et al, 2016); shifting from failure to prevention mind-set (Czajkowski, 2017); highlighting the most dominant cost elements and cost categories (Chatzipetrou and Moschidis, 2018); estimating the appraisal and prevention cost parameters in isolation and in combination (Sawan et al, 2018); determining the cost of run failures (Schmidt and Pearson, 2019); making a reliable prognosis of failure cost (Sturm et al, 2019)…”
Section: ) Coq Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De acordo com Schmidt e Pearson (2019), os custos da qualidade podem ser compreendidos como a diferença entre o custo atual para prover um produto ou serviço e o custo que ocorreria se não existissem erros. À luz desse entendimento, o método mais comum na determinação dos custos da qualidade é denominado como "Prevenção-Avaliação-Falha" (PAF) (Farooq, Kirchain, Novoa & Araújo 2017;Schmidt & Pearson, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…: retrabalho ou fornecimento equivocado do produto/serviço) (Farooq et al, 2017). À gestão das diversas entidades, os custos de prevenção e avaliação são mais fáceis de serem mensurados, enquanto custos de falhas são mais complexos (Schmidt & Pearson, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Establishing a CoQ management system for power generation firms Murumkar et al (2017) [15] Surveying the literature and models Teli et al (2018) [16] Analyzing the COQ in Indian auto industry Schmidt and Pearson (2019) [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%