2004
DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.30826.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating the Date of Hepatitis C Virus Infection from Patient Interviews and Antibody Tests on Stored Sera

Abstract: Inaccuracies in the length of HCV could occur in outcome studies that rely on patient recall of risk-factor history. Statistical methods that incorporate the uncertainty in assigning infection date are needed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As in several previous reports, 6,9,24,31 fibrosis progression rate was calculated from a single liver biopsy and estimated disease duration. Potential inaccuracy in the presumed date of infection 32 was limited by exclusive enrollment of patients with a previous history of a single, well-identified route of exposure. The assumption of linearity of FPR has recently been disputed in a report suggesting late acceleration of fibrogenesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in several previous reports, 6,9,24,31 fibrosis progression rate was calculated from a single liver biopsy and estimated disease duration. Potential inaccuracy in the presumed date of infection 32 was limited by exclusive enrollment of patients with a previous history of a single, well-identified route of exposure. The assumption of linearity of FPR has recently been disputed in a report suggesting late acceleration of fibrogenesis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certainly the use of FPRs in HCV disease models has inherent problems relating to liver biopsy staging and sampling errors, the assumption that liver injury follows a linear course, and inaccuracies in estimating the duration of infection. 31 The use of patient self-reporting for duration of infection may have led to a potential bias in our Kaplan-Meier baseline estimates for projected time to progression to cirrhosis, but this result would have affected the homozygous and heterozygous subgroups equally. Approximately half of the patients in this study had minimal fibrosis with slow FPRs that would make it difficult to detect any weak associations that may influence disease progression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Subjects classified as havn p 15 ing mild disease had either no (stage 0) or mild (stage 1) fibrosis in liver biospy samples obtained at an average interval of 0.1 years before study completion ( ). The estimated date of n p 33 HCV infection was assigned on the basis of the date of first injection drug use or blood transfusion exposure (before July 1992) and was correlated with seroconversion data generated from stored serum specimens, as described elsewhere [28]. Of 355 HCV genotype 1-infected patients in the cohort, 52 were selected for longitudinal study of viral dynamics on the basis of the number of historical serum specimens available for testing (minimum of 3 specimens spanning at least 5 years), completion of a current liver biopsy, and absence of laboratory or clinical evidence of hepatitis B virus or HIV coinfection.…”
Section: Subjects Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%