Abstract:The application of average atomic volumes to predict the crystal densities of benzene-derived energetic compounds of general formula C H N O is presented, along with the reliability of this method. The densities of 119 neutral nitrobenzenes, energetic salts, and cocrystals with diverse compositions were estimated and compared with experimental data. Of the 74 nitrobenzenes for which direct comparisons could be made, the % error in the estimated density was within 0-3% for 54 compounds, 3-5% for 12 compounds, a… Show more
Organic and ionic compounds containing energetic groups have wide applications in industries because they can release their stored chemical energy upon external stimuli. Many different methods have been developed in recent years for reliable prediction of the densities of these compounds at room temperature because their detonation performance depends strongly on density. This work reviews the best available predictive models for important classes of energetic organic and ionic compounds that reduce the high costs of synthesis and development of the new proposed compounds. The advantages and limitations of different methods are discussed and compared for different kinds of neutral and ionic energetic compounds. Among different approaches, quantum‐chemical methods based on molecular surface electrostatic potential (MESP) and quantitative structure‐property relationship (QSPR) approaches are attractive for scientists and industries in recent years because they can be applied for a wide range of various types of compounds. For 25 neutral energetic organic compounds and 11 energetic ionic compounds where the percentages of deviations of the outputs of quantum‐chemical MESP‐based methods are large, it is shown that the outputs of the best available QSPR methods, which were embedded in new computer code (EMDB_1.0), are more accurate.
Organic and ionic compounds containing energetic groups have wide applications in industries because they can release their stored chemical energy upon external stimuli. Many different methods have been developed in recent years for reliable prediction of the densities of these compounds at room temperature because their detonation performance depends strongly on density. This work reviews the best available predictive models for important classes of energetic organic and ionic compounds that reduce the high costs of synthesis and development of the new proposed compounds. The advantages and limitations of different methods are discussed and compared for different kinds of neutral and ionic energetic compounds. Among different approaches, quantum‐chemical methods based on molecular surface electrostatic potential (MESP) and quantitative structure‐property relationship (QSPR) approaches are attractive for scientists and industries in recent years because they can be applied for a wide range of various types of compounds. For 25 neutral energetic organic compounds and 11 energetic ionic compounds where the percentages of deviations of the outputs of quantum‐chemical MESP‐based methods are large, it is shown that the outputs of the best available QSPR methods, which were embedded in new computer code (EMDB_1.0), are more accurate.
“…11a The introduction of ÀNHNO 2 groups onto a planar aromatic ring enhances the density and energetic properties. 12 In addition, the planarity of this ring maximizes weak non-covalent interactions (p-stacking, cation/p, anion-p, X-H/p, etc. ), which play vital roles in increasing thermal stability and decreasing the sensitivity toward the external stimuli.…”
Functionalization of planar aromatic rings is very straightforward, up scalable, and economical in comparison with many azole, caged, linear or cyclic structures. In our present work, a facile synthesis of...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.