2012
DOI: 10.3386/w18055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating the Economic Impacts of Living Wage Mandates Using Ex Ante Simulations, Longitudinal Estimates, and New Public and Administrative Data: Evidence for New York City

Abstract: At least one co-author has disclosed a financial relationship of potential relevance for this research. Further information is available online at http://www.nber.org/papers/w18055.ack NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peerreviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These estimated effects capture the distribution of wage and employment (and hours) effects on families at different points of the income distribution. Again, the methods follow Adams and Neumark (2005a) and details are provided in Neumark et al (2012). This analysis arrives at a preferred estimated effect of −0.035, which implies, for example, that a 100% increase in a business assistance living wage reduces the poverty rate by 3.5 percentage points (again not statistically significant but consistent across many specifications and samples and significant in some).…”
Section: Simulating the Effects Of The Living Wage In New York Citymentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These estimated effects capture the distribution of wage and employment (and hours) effects on families at different points of the income distribution. Again, the methods follow Adams and Neumark (2005a) and details are provided in Neumark et al (2012). This analysis arrives at a preferred estimated effect of −0.035, which implies, for example, that a 100% increase in a business assistance living wage reduces the poverty rate by 3.5 percentage points (again not statistically significant but consistent across many specifications and samples and significant in some).…”
Section: Simulating the Effects Of The Living Wage In New York Citymentioning
confidence: 88%
“…There were a number of complications stemming from changes in the classification of geographic areas in the CPS. Details are provided in Neumark et al (2012). That same paper also presents a lengthy discussion of earlier criticisms of the research using the CPS data to estimate the effects of living wage laws, concluding that the CPS data and the methods used give valid results.…”
Section: Simulating the Effects Of The Living Wage In New York Citymentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These estimated effects capture the distribution of wage and employment (and hours) effects on families at different points of the income distribution. Again, the methods follow Adams and Neumark (2005b), and details are provided in Neumark et al (2012). This analysis arrives at a preferred estimated effect of −0.035, which implies, for example, that a 100% increase in a business assistance living wage reduces the poverty rate by 3.5 percentage points (again not statistically significant, but positive across many specifications and samples, and significant in some).…”
Section: Estimated Effects On Low-wage Workers and Low-income Familiesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Much of this scholarship has used economic data to explore or forecast LW effects on employment nationally (e.g. NZ Treasury, 2013;Maloney and Gilbertson, 2013) or at the city or county levels (Brenner, 2005;Neumark et al, 2012;Fairris and Fernandez Bujanda, 2007;London Economics, 2009;Ivanova and Klein, 2013). In their review, Maloney and Gilbertson (2013, p. v) stressed the "considerable evidence in [international] literature that implementing a living wage directly increases the actual wages of targeted workers" and furthermore that "(p)aying a living wage can increase productivity, reduce worker turnover and absenteeism, and improve the quality of future job applicants.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%