1999
DOI: 10.1080/00213624.1999.11506187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating the Effects of Informal Economic Activity: Evidence from Los Angeles County

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
46
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
46
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is also no evidence that personnel in the services and construction sectors are attracted to formal sector activity (non significant coefficients). This result is at odds with that of Marcelli et al (1999) and Losby and Edgcomb (2002) who find that households from the services and construction sectors are more likely to supply services in the informal sector. Persons employed by the government are marginally less likely than the self-employed (reference modality) to be involved in the demand for and supply of goods and services in the informal sector (negative coefficient significant at 10%), which seems to be accord with results obtained by Hart (1970Hart ( , 1973 who observes that self-employed persons tend to be major suppliers in the informal sector, since they have more freedom in reporting their incomes and they could under-report or not report their income at all.…”
Section: Empirical Investigation Of the Decision To Participate In Thcontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…There is also no evidence that personnel in the services and construction sectors are attracted to formal sector activity (non significant coefficients). This result is at odds with that of Marcelli et al (1999) and Losby and Edgcomb (2002) who find that households from the services and construction sectors are more likely to supply services in the informal sector. Persons employed by the government are marginally less likely than the self-employed (reference modality) to be involved in the demand for and supply of goods and services in the informal sector (negative coefficient significant at 10%), which seems to be accord with results obtained by Hart (1970Hart ( , 1973 who observes that self-employed persons tend to be major suppliers in the informal sector, since they have more freedom in reporting their incomes and they could under-report or not report their income at all.…”
Section: Empirical Investigation Of the Decision To Participate In Thcontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…Empirical evidence indicates that informal work in most developing countries is concentrated in the distribution sector, with a relatively low prevalence in certain sectors, such as the manufacturing sector (Castells andPortes 1989, International Labour Organisation 2002). Further, Marcelli et al (1999) and Losby and Edgecomb (2002) find that the characteristics of the construction sector make it easy to use the services of informal workers. Lemieux et al (1994) establish that there is a negative relationship between time spent in the informal and formal sectors, while Schneider and Enste (2003) provide evidence that some agents move seamlessly between the two sectors.…”
Section: Socio-economic and Demographic Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reviewing the extensive literature, at least 45 different adjectives have been employed to describe informality, including 'atypical', 'cash-in-hand', 'hidden', 'irregular', 'non-visible', 'shadow', 'undeclared', 'underground' and 'unregulated'. Nearly all describe what is insufficient or missing relative to the formal economy. Despite these diverse terms, however, a strong consensus is that what is missing or absent is that this remunerated production and sale of goods and services is legitimate in all respects besides the fact that it is unregistered by, or hidden from the state for tax and/or benefit purposes (European Commission, 1998;Evans et al, 2006;Katungi et al, 2006;Marcelli et al, 1999;OECD, 2000OECD, , 2002Renooy et al, 2004;Portes, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%