2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.epidem.2021.100482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating the generation interval and inferring the latent period of COVID-19 from the contact tracing data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
59
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 50 53 To set up the analysis for COVID-19, we consider w as a Gamma distribution having mean (±SD) values of 5.3 (±2.1) days by averaging the GT estimates from the existing literatures. 50 57 Slight variation in the settings of the GT will not affect our main findings.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“… 50 53 To set up the analysis for COVID-19, we consider w as a Gamma distribution having mean (±SD) values of 5.3 (±2.1) days by averaging the GT estimates from the existing literatures. 50 57 Slight variation in the settings of the GT will not affect our main findings.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The generative time has been estimated through the synchronization between the signals in the calibration steps. This is equivalent to the delay estimate used by RtLive and Epiforecast and other reconstruction infection estimates as 17 , 18 , 47 , 48 as in Fig. 3 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The rate at which contacts occur is determined by the mixing patterns of each age group. The latent period and average generation time were set to be 4.4 [ 28 30 ] and 7 [ 31 ] days, respectively. We consider a basic reproductive number ( R 0 ) of 6.0 according to estimates for the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant [ 1 4 , 6 12 , 16 – 18 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%