2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03332.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating the impact of healthcare-associated infections on length of stay and costs

Abstract: Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) unquestionably have substantial effects on morbidity and mortality. However, quantifying the exact economic burden attributable to HAIs still remains a challenging issue. Inaccurate estimations may arise from two major sources of bias. First, factors other than infection may affect patients' length of stay (LOS) and healthcare utilization. Second, HAI is a time-varying exposure, as the infection can impact on LOS and costs only after the infection has started. The most f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
94
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 128 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
94
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…4 Although some believed this was an effective strategy to reduce HAIs, others were concerned that not all HAIs were preventable and that the incentive under consideration would present challenges to hospitals caring for patients at high risk for HAIs. 5 To estimate the proportion of preventable HAIs in the most efficient and accurate manner, we used an up-to-date federally funded systematic review that examined the effectiveness of single and multimodal interventions on HAI prevention 6 as well as the most recent and valid estimates of HAI incidence. 7 We also conducted our own systematic review of studies examining the incremental costs of individual HAIs.…”
Section: Reply To Graves Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4 Although some believed this was an effective strategy to reduce HAIs, others were concerned that not all HAIs were preventable and that the incentive under consideration would present challenges to hospitals caring for patients at high risk for HAIs. 5 To estimate the proportion of preventable HAIs in the most efficient and accurate manner, we used an up-to-date federally funded systematic review that examined the effectiveness of single and multimodal interventions on HAI prevention 6 as well as the most recent and valid estimates of HAI incidence. 7 We also conducted our own systematic review of studies examining the incremental costs of individual HAIs.…”
Section: Reply To Graves Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 The consequence is that results are biased upward. 7 Barnett et al 8 showed that 11.23 extra days in the hospital were attributable to a case of healthcareassociated infection when the timing of infection was ignored and that, when the timing of infection was appropriately included, the additional duration of hospital stay was reduced to 1.35 days.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Identifying a real, well-justified instrumental variable may be very difficult [72]. These last methods have scarcely been used in the study of antimicrobial therapy of MDROs, but exploring their applicability in this field could be interesting.…”
Section: Gram-negative Bacteriamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For these GEE models, we assumed a gamma distributed dependent variable with a log link. Similar to the fracture analyses, the dependent variables in the cost regressions were lagged forward one quarter to allow us to estimate the impact of a change behavior on expenditures in the subsequent quarter, all of which will have occurred after the change behavior occurred [53,54]. We ran separate models for each outcome: total costs, osteoporosisrelated costs, and osteoporosis-related pharmacy costs (see Cost outcomes, above) for overall patients, high-risk patients, and not highrisk patients.…”
Section: Effect Of Change Behaviors On Costmentioning
confidence: 99%