2007
DOI: 10.1177/153244000700700405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating the Impact of State Policies and Institutions with Mixed-Level Data

Abstract: Researchers often seek to understand the effects of state policies or institutions on individual behavior or other outcomes in sub-state-level observational units (e.g., election results in state legislative districts). However, standard estimation methods applied to such models do not properly account for the clustering of observations within states and may lead researchers to overstate the statistical significance of state-level factors. We discuss the theory behind two approaches to dealing with clustering-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
228
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 342 publications
(234 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
228
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We refrain here from a detailed discussion (though cf. Franzese, 2005; as well as Primo et al, 2007 for an exhaustive as well as instructive debate), but point instead to the two issues most relevant in our decision for the two-step approach. First, simultaneous models tend to experience convergence problems when faced with large clusters (i.e.…”
Section: The Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We refrain here from a detailed discussion (though cf. Franzese, 2005; as well as Primo et al, 2007 for an exhaustive as well as instructive debate), but point instead to the two issues most relevant in our decision for the two-step approach. First, simultaneous models tend to experience convergence problems when faced with large clusters (i.e.…”
Section: The Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The outcome variables are measured at the individual level and the main predictor of interest (family practices) are measured at the country-level and this could bias our estimates. To correct for this we have used clustered standard errors and in an alternative specification used a varying-intercept multilevel model (Primo et al 2007;Bates et al 2015).…”
Section: Family Systems and Current Day Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…we used a regression with clustered standard errors (Primo et al, 2007) (Table 2). Running a regression with such a small number of cases does, of course, mean that the results have to be interpreted with special care.…”
Section: Let's Talk Europe -Empirical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%