2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2014.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating the non-market benefits of climate change adaptation of river ecosystem services: A choice experiment application in the Aoos basin, Greece

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
18
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Notwithstanding the extensive application of DCEs in river ecosystems valuation, the empirical literature is quite limited regarding the valuation of adaptation options to increase the robustness and resilience of river systems to climate change. To the authors' knowledge, there is only one similar study for the Aoos River in Greece (Andreopoulos et al, 2015) and an application of the DCE on a groundwater dependent ecosystem affected by climate change in Finland (Koundouri et al, 2014). Thus, this paper extends the limited analytical work on the economic valuation of non-market adaptation benefits for river systems threatened by climate change.…”
Section: Experimental Design and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Notwithstanding the extensive application of DCEs in river ecosystems valuation, the empirical literature is quite limited regarding the valuation of adaptation options to increase the robustness and resilience of river systems to climate change. To the authors' knowledge, there is only one similar study for the Aoos River in Greece (Andreopoulos et al, 2015) and an application of the DCE on a groundwater dependent ecosystem affected by climate change in Finland (Koundouri et al, 2014). Thus, this paper extends the limited analytical work on the economic valuation of non-market adaptation benefits for river systems threatened by climate change.…”
Section: Experimental Design and Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The indirect utility function for an individual i selecting an alternative j at a choice situation t, takes the form as follow [33] …”
Section: Choice Experiments Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above mentioned implicit prices do not provide estimates of compensating surplus (CS) for new ecofriendly service alternative scenarios, but welfare measurement can be derived from the marginal rate of substitution between the residual of the initial and alternative utility states divided by the marginal utility of income, which represented by coefficient of "price" attribute [33]. The difference between the welfare measures under the status quo and the alternative scenario are estimated to find the CS associated with each scenario [33].…”
Section: Welfare Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…。针对目前现状, 有必 要调动公众积极参与到保护工作中来。从理论角 度看, 许晓明基于收益和成本的视角分析了公众参 与环境活动的行为, 认为公众参与既是手段、 又是 工具, 是保护生态环境的重要环节 [4] 。从可行性看, 中国公众对于生物资源保护的意识将较快增强 [5] , 而公众对生物资源较强的保护意识能够显著增加 公众参与生物资源保护的行为 [6] , 这表明通过公众 参与的方式、 加强生物资源的保护力度这一思路在 中国是可行的。 当前, 中国政府及保护组织对生物资源实行的 是有针对性的保护, 优先选择保护濒危程度较高的 物种 [7] 。然而, 值得深思的是, 政府对生物资源的保 [8] 的 " 特 性 需 求 理 论 " 以 及 Thurstone [9] 的 "随机效用理论" 的基础上发展起来 的, 目前该方法已被广泛应用到环境经济学领域, Adamowicz 等首次运用选择实验法研究了环境领 域的问题 [11] ; Mark 等利用选择实验法评估了澳大利 亚新南威尔士州一处湿地的非市场价值 [12] ; Carlsson 等运用选择实验法评估了瑞士家庭对于免于断电 的支付意愿 [13] ; Andreopoulos 等使用选择实验法分 析了希腊某条河流附近的居民对于气候变化的偏 好 [14] 。国内学者对运用选择实验法评估自然资源与 生态环境的非市场价值已有所涉及, 如马爱慧等基 于选择实验法的视角, 分析了武汉市城乡居民对于 耕地面积、 耕地质量与肥力、 耕地周边景观与生态 环境和耕地保护支付成本 4 项保护属性及所组合方 案政策的可能反应和接受意愿 [15] ; 王尔大等以沈阳 国家森林公园为例, 采用选择实验法分析效用最大 化的景区资源和管理属性组合, 并对景区内的主 要 属 性 进 行 经 济 价 值 评 价 [16] ; 李京梅等应用选择 实验法, 评估了胶州湾地区湿地围垦造成的生态效 益损失, 并提出了生态修复优选方案 [17] Table 5 The estimation of multinomial logit model …”
unclassified