2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2008.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating the potential for spalling around a deep nuclear waste repository in crystalline rock

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
86
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 257 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These stress thresholds are essential and useful parameters for engineering projects. For example, the crack initiation stress can be used to estimate the lower limit value of spalling rock mass strength [3,4]. Some brittleness indices have strong correlations with the crack damage stress and peak stress [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These stress thresholds are essential and useful parameters for engineering projects. For example, the crack initiation stress can be used to estimate the lower limit value of spalling rock mass strength [3,4]. Some brittleness indices have strong correlations with the crack damage stress and peak stress [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers have suggested that the crack initiation observed in laboratory compression tests provides a good estimate of the operational spalling strength observed in hard brittle rocks around underground openings (Diederichs, 2007;Andersson et al, 2009;Martin and Christiansson, 2009;Rojat et al, 2009). Damjanac and Fairhurst (2010) suggested that crack initiation may also be used as a lower bound estimate for the long-term strength threshold of crystalline rocks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Martin and Christiansson (2009) suggest that the magnitude of in-situ spalling strength for glacially eroded massive Scandinavian Crystalline rocks lies between 55% and 65% of the intact rock strength while the laboratory tested Crack Initiation (CI) strength may be between 40 and 50% of the intact rock strength (σci). Comparison of the CI values measured in laboratory uniaxial tests and the rock mass spalling strength by Martin et al (1999) suggests that the crack initiation provides the lower bound limit for the rock spalling strength.…”
Section: Maximum Tangential Stress and Rock Spalling Strengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These four methods represent either empirical or semi-analytical approaches and are classified by Panthi (2017) as; 1) Norwegian Rule of Thumb (Selmer-Olsen, 1965), 2) Stress Problem Classification -part of Q-system (Barton et al 1974), 3), Uniaxial Compressive Strength and Tensile Strength Approach (Diederichs, 2007) and 4), Maximum Tangential Stress and Crack Initiation Strength Approach (Martin and Christiansson, 2009). Finally, discussions are also made on the limitations and extent of their applicability and improvements are suggested to improve the applicability of the fourth method, which can be used through engineering decision-making process.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%