Estimating the Recession-Mortality Relationship when Migration Matters

Abstract

A large literature following Ruhm (2000) suggests that mortality falls during recessions and rises during booms. The panel-data approach used to generate these results assumes that either there is no substantial migration response to temporary changes in local economic conditions, or that any such response is accurately captured by intercensal population estimates. To assess the importance of these assumptions, we examine two natural experiments: the recession in cotton textile-producing districts of Britain during the U.S. Civil War, and the coal boom in Appalachian counties of the U.S. that followed the OPEC oil embargo in the 1970s. In both settings, we find evidence of a substantial migratory response. Moreover, we show that estimates of the relationship between business cycles and mortality are highly sensitive to assumptions related to migration. After adjusting for migration, we find that mortality increased during the cotton recession, but was largely unaffected by the coal boom. Overall, our results suggest that migration can meaningfully bias estimates of the impact of business-cycle fluctuations on mortality.

The empirical relationship between nonstandard economic behaviors

“…Finally, we have no evidence linking the constructs measured in our experiment to behaviors of interest outside the laboratory, such as financial, employment, or even political decisions. Subsequent papers, explicitly building on ours, attempt to collect data that address some of these issues, although at times with a different focus (29)(30)(31)(32)(33).…”

“…More recently, a few papers have followed subsequent to our initial research (29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34). Some of these papers are complementary to ours, having different aims, and therefore making use of different questions and analysis.…”

Health and health inequality during the great recession: Evidence from the PSID

“…First, we estimate the relationship between the Great Recession and health at the individual level rather than the state level. We contend that this is more appropriate since as has been shown by Arthi, et al (2017) and argued by Halliday (2014), migration can severely bias aggregate health measurements such as mortality rates. This may underscore why studies at the aggregate level either find positive or, on occasion e.g.…”

Race and life expectancy in the USA in the Great Depression

“…Linder and Grove, 1943, (Hetzel, 1997). 4 Moreover, the Great Migration involved blacks moving from areas with worse data quality to areas with better data quality, which can also introduce a bias (Arthi et al 2017). 5 There has recently been a renaissance in Great Migration studies: cf.…”