2008
DOI: 10.1525/auk.2008.07002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ESTIMATING THE RESPONSE OF RING-NECKED PHEASANTS (PHASIANUS COLCHICUS) TO THE CONSERVATION RESERVE PROGRAM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
38
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Survey data Link 2002, 2011;Thogmartin et al 2004;Nielson et al 2008) and data from largescale monitoring efforts like the west-wide golden eagle survey (Millsap et al 2013, Nielson et al 2014). …”
Section: Appendix II -Methodology Used In Modeled Trend Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Survey data Link 2002, 2011;Thogmartin et al 2004;Nielson et al 2008) and data from largescale monitoring efforts like the west-wide golden eagle survey (Millsap et al 2013, Nielson et al 2014). …”
Section: Appendix II -Methodology Used In Modeled Trend Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach reduced the potential bias that could result if larger leks tended to be monitored earlier (e.g., 1965-1980; larger lek = more males) and many smaller leks were only recently included in the monitoring efforts. This hierarchical modeling approach included both fixed and random effects and was similar to approaches used to estimate trends in Breeding Bird Survey data Link 2002, 2011;Thogmartin et al 2004;Nielson et al 2008) and data from large-scale monitoring efforts like the west-wide golden eagle survey (Millsap et al 2013, Nielson et al 2014. A complete description of this modeling approach and assumptions made is included in Appendix II.…”
Section: Modeled Trend Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hierarchical structure of the model makes efficient use of the data and is less sensitive to annual variation in sampling error. In addition, the HB 3 model can be expanded easily to include covariables and explicit spatial structure (e.g., Thogmartin et al 2004;Nielson et al 2008), and the HB framework lends itself well to composite and comparative analyses of the BBS and other surveys (e.g., link and Sauer 2007 and the method used here to compare the magnitude and precision of trends from the two models). Finally, the HB 3 model estimates trends and annual indices within a single coherent model structure which the ml model lacks.…”
Section: Improved Population Inference From Bbsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models utilize presence, absence or abundance data from museum vouchers or field surveys and environmental predictors to create probability models of species distributions within landscapes, regions and continents (Guisan and Thuiller 2005). These models can forecast potential future impacts of environmental changes on species distributions, allowing practitioners to assess alternative policies and actions to plan for the change (Nielson et al 2008). It also estimates the relative suitability of habitat known to be occupied by the species, relative suitability of habitat in geographical areas not known to be occupied by the species, changes in the suitability of habitat over time given a specific scenario for environmental change and the species niche (Warren and Seifert 2011).…”
Section: Species Distribution Modelling Ecological Niche Modelling Omentioning
confidence: 99%