2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2004.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating the safe starting dose in phase I clinical trials and no observed effect level based on QSAR modeling of the human maximum recommended daily dose

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
64
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For mice in the rimonabant group, rimonabant was mixed with baked high cholesterol chow at a final concentration of 0.065% 16) and provided every day for 3 months. According to the Food and Drug Administration-recommended formula, this animal dose of 8 mg/kg/day is equal to a human dose of 0.33 mg/kg/day 17) . Twenty-four mice (12 controls and 12 receiving 8 mg/kg/day) were used for in vivo evaluation.…”
Section: Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For mice in the rimonabant group, rimonabant was mixed with baked high cholesterol chow at a final concentration of 0.065% 16) and provided every day for 3 months. According to the Food and Drug Administration-recommended formula, this animal dose of 8 mg/kg/day is equal to a human dose of 0.33 mg/kg/day 17) . Twenty-four mice (12 controls and 12 receiving 8 mg/kg/day) were used for in vivo evaluation.…”
Section: Protocolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is essentially equivalent to the NOAEL in humans, a dose beyond which adverse (toxicological) or undesirable pharmacological effects are observed. It has been considered that with the exception of chemotherapeutics and immunosuppressants, the MRTD/10 would correspond to a dose exerting neither therapeutic nor chronic adverse effects in humans Contrera et al, 2004). For nonpharmaceutical chemicals, there is no desired pharmacological effect and any compound-related effect could be interpreted as adverse or non-desirable effect.…”
Section: How Is (Q)sar Analysis Used In Your Organisation?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MABEL is the lowest dose that is associated with any biological effect, whether it be toxicity or a desired pharmacological effect (16). MABEL is calculated using the following PK/PD data: (1) in vitro target binding and receptor occupancy in target human and animal cells, (2) in vitro concentration-response curves in target human and animal cells, (3) in vivo dose-exposure-response profiles in relevant animal species, and (4) exposures at pharmacological active doses in relevant animal species. To minimize the potential risks of adverse effects in humans, a safety factor is applied in the calculation of the FIH dose from the MABEL.…”
Section: Mabel-based Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The starting dose must be low enough to be safe but high enough to avoid excessive dose escalations, which are costly and timeconsuming. The most widely used method for FIH dose estimation is based on no observable adverse effect levels (NOAELs) in multiple species (1,2). NOAELs are determined in relevant animal studies and normalized to body surface area (in milligrams per square meter), and then extrapolated to human equivalent doses (HEDs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%