2017
DOI: 10.1080/00268976.2017.1288939
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating the solubility of 1:1 electrolyte aqueous solutions: the chemical potential difference rule

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…dotted lines indicate the experimental values. 33 The corresponding numerical data are given in 93 The number of contact ion pairs (CIP) is defined as…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…dotted lines indicate the experimental values. 33 The corresponding numerical data are given in 93 The number of contact ion pairs (CIP) is defined as…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] Following the increased use of TIP4P/2005 and demand of ion parameters specifically optimized for TIP4P/2005, the Vega group started working on obtaining parameters for NaCl in terms of solubility. 41,42 The final parameters are presented in the study of Benavides et al 43 Recently, additional ion parameters were published, 44 for Li + , Na + , K + , Mg 2+ , Ca 2+ , Cl − , and SO 2− 4 . However, their performance considering hydration free energies relies on a scaling parameter in order to account for the reduced charges, as will be shown in Sec.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The JC and Mamatkulov ions have gained popularity in MD studies, and many properties have also been investigated for these ions. 25,41,42,56 Trivalent and quadrivalent cations were parameterized by Liu and Patey, 30 who fitted ion parameters to experimental ΔG solv and rIO values. However, for these highly charged ions, it was found that the standard 12-6 LJ potential could not simultaneously reproduce both properties accurately.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a more comprehensive discussion of common parametrization strategies employed for molecular modeling of aqueous electrolyte solutions, see the review of Nezbeda et al 45 In general, however, these strategies yield unsatisfactory predictions for solution properties, such as density, 46 water self-diffusion coefficient, 47 or salt activity. 48,49 In fact, the underprediction of the solubility limit of alkali halide salts, 45,[50][51][52][53][54] resulting in excessive ion pairing [55][56][57] and/or premature crystallization, [58][59][60] is a wellknown problem of non-polarizable ion force fields. The cause may lie in unbalanced force field parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%