Estimating the transmission potential of supercritical processes based on the final size distribution of minor outbreaks

Abstract

Use of the final size distribution of minor outbreaks for the estimation of the reproduction numbers of supercritical epidemic processes has yet to be considered. We used a branching process model to derive the final size distribution of minor outbreaks, assuming a reproduction number above unity, and applying the method to final size data for pneumonic plague. Pneumonic plague is a rare disease with only one documented major epidemic in a spatially limited setting. Because the final size distribution of a minor outbreak needs to be normalized by the probability of extinction, we assume that the dispersion parameter (k) of the negative-binomial offspring distribution is known, and examine the sensitivity of the reproduction number to variation in dispersion. Assuming a geometric offspring distribution with k = 1, the reproduction number was estimated at 1.16 (95% confidence interval: 0.97–1.38). When less dispersed with k = 2, the maximum likelihood estimate of the reproduction number was 1.14. These estimates agreed with those published from transmission network analysis, indicating that the human-to-human transmission potential of the pneumonic plague is not very high. Given only minor outbreaks, transmission potential is not sufficiently assessed by directly counting the number of offspring. Since the absence of a major epidemic does not guarantee a subcritical process, the proposed method allows us to conservatively regard epidemic data from minor outbreaks as supercritical, and yield estimates of threshold values above unity.

How to interpret the transmissibility of novel influenza A(H7N9): an analysis of initial epidemiological data of human cases from China

“…The proposed simple model ignored a well-known variation in the number of secondary cases at an individual level (i.e. the variance of the offspring distribution), which could have led our CI to be unrealistically narrow [20,21]. Third, as was indicated by Cauchemez et al [12], the estimate of the reproduction number using the fraction of cases with a history of reservoir contact may be biased upward if some cases are detected through outbreak investigation.…”

Assessing the risk of observing multiple generations of Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS) cases given an imported case

“…For the estimation of the two model parameters, we used two different pieces of likelihood. The first one analyses the distribution of the total number of cases as described by Breban et al for MERS [4], but the present study specifically focused on importation events [12]. Given the total number of cases z for each importation event, the likelihood to estimate R 0 and k was calculated as…”

Comparing methods for estimating R0 from the size distribution of subcritical transmission chains

“…Therefore, in many settings the observed chain size distribution will suffer from an unknown amount of observation error. A second complicating factor is that transmission heterogeneity may impact the observed chain size distribution, because the existence of super-spreaders causes chains to be small in most cases and very large in a few others (Lloyd-Smith et al, 2005; Garske and Rhodes, 2008; Nishiura et al., 2012; Blumberg and Lloyd-Smith, 2013). If heterogeneity is not properly accounted for, studies may be inclined to ignore isolated cases as ‘unreliable data’ because of discrepancy with model predictions.…”