Estimating the True Size of Public Procurement to Assess Sustainability Impact

Abstract

Public procurement, the government’s purchase of goods and services, is an important tool to advance sustainability objectives. Since government is the largest consumer in the economy, it can have a sizable impact on the market by purchasing sustainably. However, its sustainability impact (both environmental and social) is undermined because the public procurement’s size is underestimated. Previous estimates of public procurement only consider contract-based purchases or non-defense purchases. In other instances, data are too limited to estimate government purchases appropriately. These factors lead to underestimations of the extent to which government purchasing can be leveraged to advance sustainability objectives. To understand the true impact of government purchases, we estimated the size of public procurement by considering all aspects of public procurement. We used this estimation to assess whether current measurement processes misrepresent the size of public procurement and identify key elements that may be missing from the current public procurement measures. We applied our estimate to four OECD countries, the U.S., the U.K., Italy, and the Netherlands for two years (2017 and 2018). Our results showed that that across all levels of government, public procurement as a percentage of GDP in the U.S., the U.K., Italy, and the Netherlands ranged between 19–24%, 13–56%, 3–10%, and 12–38%, respectively. Our findings revealed that governments have substantially greater market power than previously estimated, which can be leveraged to pursue sustainability goals. Our findings also illustrate systemic data challenges to how public procurement data are collected and analyzed.

Determinants of local government innovation: the case of green public procurement in the United States

“…Yet, currently, procurement has outgrown its purely administrative function (Trammell et al, 2020;Abd Razak et al, 2016) evolving to be an innovative demand-side policy tool that incorporate other policy goals into the procurement processe.g. environmental protection, social equity, sustainability, innovation (Edler and Georghiou, 2007;Storsj€ o and Kachali, 2017;Hsueh et al, 2020;Hafsa et al, 2021;Chen et al, 2021).…”

Saudi Procurement System and Regulations: Overview of Local and International Administrative Contracts

“…They argued that rational choice theory would be utilized to control such contractual crimes, and a mixed blunder of the different approaches should be used to control such crimes. Hafsa et al (2021) argued that government is the largest customer in any economy through its procurements. Hence, public procurement would help increase the aggregate demand in the economy and ensure purchasing sustainability.…”

The upcoming rise of SMEs in cross-border public procurement: is it a matter of networking capabilities?

“…The role of SMEs in the EU has traditionally been crucial for economic growth (Albano et al 2015). Despite the lack of specific integrated statistics on the worldwide scope of cross-border procurement for SMEs (Muñoz-García & Vila, 2019), the size of the public procurement market is around 12% of the GDP of OECD countries (OECD, 2019), although some authors consider that this percentage likely misrepresents the true size of public procurement (Hafsa et al, 2021). In the EU, the public purchase of goods and services accounts for approximately 16% of GDP (European Commission, 2017).…”