2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejps.2016.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating the variability in fraction absorbed as a paradigm for informing formulation development in early clinical drug development

Abstract: Purpose: Inter-subject variability in oral drug absorption is usually reported using bioavailabilty, which 69 has the components: fraction absorbed (fa), fraction passing the gut wall (fg) and fraction escaping 70 hepatic metabolism (fh). In this study, we sought to separate the absorption (fa*fg) and elimination (fh) 71 components of bioavailability to study variability of absorption and to investigate the effect of 72 formulations, gastric pH and food on absorption variability.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each study group was tested as a covariate and retained in the model if it decreased an objective function value by at least 3.84 (statistical significance level 0.05). Oral bioavail-ability was included in the model by logit transformation (1/(1 + EXP(−(F + IIV F ))), where F is a parameter for bioavailability and IIV F its interindividual variability) to ensure its value between 0 and 1 [44]. Standard error for F was calculated by the delta method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each study group was tested as a covariate and retained in the model if it decreased an objective function value by at least 3.84 (statistical significance level 0.05). Oral bioavail-ability was included in the model by logit transformation (1/(1 + EXP(−(F + IIV F ))), where F is a parameter for bioavailability and IIV F its interindividual variability) to ensure its value between 0 and 1 [44]. Standard error for F was calculated by the delta method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hepatic volume (V H ) in litres was associated to the subject body weight (WT, kg) as indicated by Noda et al in Equation : VH=0.05012×WT0.78 Hepatic blood flow in males was reported as 50.4 L/h/L of hepatic volume QH0.5em=50.4×VH To describe the disposition of agomelatine and its metabolites, both 1‐ and 2‐compartmental models were tested.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oral drug delivery is one of the most commonly used routes for drug administration due to its ease of use, patient acceptance and non-invasiveness. To formulate a drug for oral administration, bioavailability should be considered since it reflects the proportion of the dose that can reach systemic circulation and provide the expected therapeutic effect (Rabbie et al, 2016). Many drugs that are currently on the market or newly developed have poor bioavailability, meaning they do not reach the minimum effective concentration in the bloodstream due to factors such as limited solubility, poor absorption, and rapid metabolism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%