“…The optimization process requires the consistency with the experimental data and a simple analytical and integral structure, which involves very short processing time, in order to be profitably used in the context of optimization cycles which, for their part, involve the computation of multiple solutions. Therefore, the possibility of using costly numerical techniques of integration (CFD, DEM, SHP) (Abo Al-Kheer et al, 2011;Formato and Faugno, 2007;Kasisira, 2005;Oida and Momozu, 2002;Ros et al, 2008;Rucins and Vilde, 2004;Rucins and Vilde, 2005;Saarilahti, 2002) will be sacrificed on the altar of an analytical -integral approach, which prefers the rapidity of the calculation to the alleged accuracy of the results obtained by differential-algebraic techniques. Among the integral relations, that is possible to find in the vast scientific production that characterizes the subject in question, we have used those developed by Godwin et al, 2007. According to this approach, the complete expression of the total resistance offered by the engaged tool during the working soil (draught force) Lt [kN] may be considered as the resultant of the component necessary for the rupture of the soil (cut), the component necessary for its lifting and then overturning (inertia) and that generated by the phenomenon of friction and adhesion inside the soil considered and due to the interaction of the latter with the working surface (friction).The draught force is, therefore, expressed as the sum of all the components defined above:…”