2021
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)01591-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating total spending by source of funding on routine and supplementary immunisation activities in low-income and middle-income countries, 2000–17: a financial modelling study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tables 2 and 3 present baseline characteristics and bivariate analyses of individual and contextual factors, respectively, in a weighted sample of 43,131 children aged 12-59 months in SSA. 16.5% of children were zero-dose, i.e., had not received any vaccines. 3 National measures of the Global Peace Index (GPI) overall score were obtained from the Institute for Economics and Peace (IEP).…”
Section: Descriptive Statistics and Bivariate Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Tables 2 and 3 present baseline characteristics and bivariate analyses of individual and contextual factors, respectively, in a weighted sample of 43,131 children aged 12-59 months in SSA. 16.5% of children were zero-dose, i.e., had not received any vaccines. 3 National measures of the Global Peace Index (GPI) overall score were obtained from the Institute for Economics and Peace (IEP).…”
Section: Descriptive Statistics and Bivariate Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from these strategies, over USD 112 billion funding was provided for vaccine coverage between 2000 and 2017 [16]. However, the focus on "coverage" misses a potentially important population: children with zero-dose vaccination status.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For all unit cost inputs related to service provision, we subtracted the share contributed by international donors, to obtain unit costs reflecting the contribution of domestic resources to service provision. For vaccination costs, we assumed a donor share stratified by World Bank income level (69.4% for low-income countries, 39.4% for lower middle-income countries, 0.2% for upper middle-income countries) based on Ikilezi, et al 24 For TB diagnosis and treatment costs, we estimated country-specific donor shares using spending estimates from the WHO Global TB Report 2022 (Appendix S1). 1 For antiretroviral therapy costs, we assumed a country-specific donor share based on spending estimates from the Global Burden of Disease Collaborative Network at IHME (Appendix S1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some of the Ministerial Conference commitments included strengthening supply chains and delivery systems, and increasing universal access to vaccines and sustainable immunisation financing, the latter remains the most critical and arduous to achieve 1. This is because international donors are gradually reducing their funding for immunisation programmes in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs),4 5 as other health priorities, such as HIV/AIDS programmes, compete for limited health funding 6. Additionally, the financial resources needed for the successful implementation of immunisation programmes in LMICs are increasing because of prohibitive costs associated with the provision of the recent WHO-recommended vaccines such as the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) and the cost of extending immunisation activities to hard-to-reach areas 7.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%