2015
DOI: 10.1093/jpe/rtv056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating tree and stand sapwood area in spatially heterogeneous southeastern Australian forests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a growing body of evidence that spatial variation in T across the landscape is largely due to the spatial pattern in stand SA [8,25,42,43], whereas decadal variation in mean annual T is largely due to temporal changes in stand SA [4,44,45]. Recent LiDAR data acquisition flights across more than 500,000 ha of southeastern Australian forests provide a rich source of information on forest structure, which may be used to scale T from a tree-or stand-level to a landscapelevel with an improved understanding of how forest structure relates to SA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…There is a growing body of evidence that spatial variation in T across the landscape is largely due to the spatial pattern in stand SA [8,25,42,43], whereas decadal variation in mean annual T is largely due to temporal changes in stand SA [4,44,45]. Recent LiDAR data acquisition flights across more than 500,000 ha of southeastern Australian forests provide a rich source of information on forest structure, which may be used to scale T from a tree-or stand-level to a landscapelevel with an improved understanding of how forest structure relates to SA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Figure 6b we show that predicting SAHa directly with LiDAR indices is more accurate (R 2 = 0.56) than indirect estimates using a two-step procedure that predicts SAHa with LiDAR derived BAHa estimates and a site-specific SAHa/BAHa (RHa) relationship (R 2 = 0.50). In Figure 6c we show that using RHa derived from 15 external sites [25] and LiDAR derived BAHa estimates resulted in SAHa being systematically underestimated due to the 5 ha site's high RHa relative to the broader landscape's RHa. In Figure 6c, we also show that predicting SAHa with the relationship derived from the same external sites and LiDAR derived BAHa and SDen estimates resulted in slightly poorer predictions (R 2 = 0.48) due to the limitations of predicting SDen in small 0.04 ha plots.…”
Section: Plot Sapwood Area Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations