2018
DOI: 10.3390/rs10111845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating Tree Position, Diameter at Breast Height, and Tree Height in Real-Time Using a Mobile Phone with RGB-D SLAM

Abstract: Accurate estimation of tree position, diameter at breast height (DBH), and tree height measurements is an important task in forest inventory. Mobile Laser Scanning (MLS) is an important solution. However, the poor global navigation satellite system (GNSS) coverage under the canopy makes the MLS system unable to provide globally-consistent point cloud data, and thus, it cannot accurately estimate the forest attributes. SLAM could be an alternative for solutions dependent on GNSS. In this paper, a mobile phone w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
63
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mobile LiDAR, which can be mounted on vehicles, backpacks, and UAVs (unmanned aerial vehicles), and is capable of scanning while moving, is an alternative to terrestrial LiDAR that allows effective data collection over wide ranges. Due to this advantage, DBHs and tree heights have been estimated using mobile LiDAR at the forest scale (Fan et al 2018;Pierzchała et al 2018) and the urban street scale (Zhao et al 2018. In urban street conditions, there are obstacles such as cars and pedestrians to contend with when scanning using mobile LiDAR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mobile LiDAR, which can be mounted on vehicles, backpacks, and UAVs (unmanned aerial vehicles), and is capable of scanning while moving, is an alternative to terrestrial LiDAR that allows effective data collection over wide ranges. Due to this advantage, DBHs and tree heights have been estimated using mobile LiDAR at the forest scale (Fan et al 2018;Pierzchała et al 2018) and the urban street scale (Zhao et al 2018. In urban street conditions, there are obstacles such as cars and pedestrians to contend with when scanning using mobile LiDAR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those authors mapped five dense forest plots, compared the results with manual field measurements, and reported an RMSE range from 0.90 to 1.90 cm. Reference [4] estimated the tree DBH of nine square plots using simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) algorithms paired with a time-of-flight (TOF) camera. The DBH estimations had a 0.33 mm (1.78%) BIAS and a 1.26 cm (6.39%) RMSE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results also suggest that the device can estimate tree positions accurately, with the resulting BIAS (−8.55 to 14.88 cm on the x-axis and −12.07 to 24.49 cm on the y-axis), RMSE (12.94-33.96 cm and 17.78-28.43 cm on the x-axis and the y-axis, respectively), and Ed (30.06 cm) being small. Reference [4] estimated the tree position using the SLAM algorithms paired with a TOF camera and reported an RMSE of 0.12 m, regardless of the axis directions. Their results, however, were based on sample plots on a flat site with no weeds and small shrubs; therefore, the actual use of their method in dense forests needs further verification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations