2016
DOI: 10.13031/trans.59.10235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating Ventilation Rates of Animal Houses through CO2 Balance

Abstract: ABSTRACT.The CO 2 production rates from various animal species were measured as well as the ventilation rates (VR) ffordable and reliable means to estimate ventilation rates (VR) of animal house is desirable for quantifying air emissions from animal operations. Traditional methods using fans or nozzles installed in the outlets of the animal house are expensive, time-consuming, and are to some extent limited to mechanically ventilated animal houses (Pedersen et al., 2008). Various alternative methods have bee… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first method is CO 2 balance. For this method ( Barreto-Mendes et al, 2014 ; Liu et al, 2016 ), the leading hypothesis is that VR determines the relationship between CO 2 production in the barn and the difference in CO 2 concentrations between the inside and outside of the barn (ΔCO 2 ). CO 2 is used as an internal tracer gas.…”
Section: Measurements Using Facility-based Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first method is CO 2 balance. For this method ( Barreto-Mendes et al, 2014 ; Liu et al, 2016 ), the leading hypothesis is that VR determines the relationship between CO 2 production in the barn and the difference in CO 2 concentrations between the inside and outside of the barn (ΔCO 2 ). CO 2 is used as an internal tracer gas.…”
Section: Measurements Using Facility-based Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, RQ will be lower if the animals are fed close to maintenance and increases with greater feed intake [23,24]. The RQ of laying hens varies theoretically from 0.6 to 1.23 with averages from 0.91 to 0.95 [10,11,24,25]. This study considered an RQ of 0.95, with an increment of 10 % (RQ = 1.05) for the sensitivity analysis.…”
Section: Sensitivity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%