2021
DOI: 10.1002/cjs.11594
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation and hypothesis testing with error‐contaminated survival data under possibly misspecified measurement error models

Abstract: In the presence of covariate measurement error, there has been extensive interest in developing estimation methods for parameters associated with various survival models, where the classical additive measurement error model is commonly used to describe the measurement error process. On the contrary, hypothesis testing has been less explored for survival data with error‐contaminated covariates. Furthermore, it is important to study the impact of misspecification of the measurement error process. In this article… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One may generalize the proposed method to accommodate other parametric models for treatment assignment probabilities. When the classical measurement error model () is in doubt, sensitivity analysis can be conducted 33 …”
Section: Discussion and Extensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One may generalize the proposed method to accommodate other parametric models for treatment assignment probabilities. When the classical measurement error model () is in doubt, sensitivity analysis can be conducted 33 …”
Section: Discussion and Extensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the classical measurement error model ( 8) is in doubt, sensitivity analysis can be conducted. 33 One may extend the proposed method to other causal estimands rather than the average treatment effect. One may generalize the proposed method to the situation that time-varying mediators exist in causal mediation analysis with longitudinal data.…”
Section: Discussion and Extensionmentioning
confidence: 99%