1996
DOI: 10.1016/s1043-4526(08)60034-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation and use of Kinetic Parameter Distributions in Metabolism and Nutrition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the numerical identifiability of the kinetic parameter estimates, Table 3 shows that there are six parameters that have at least one estimate with an FSD Ͼ0.5. Only two parameters, k (5,4) and k (10,9), exhibit poor estimate precision in Ն50% of cases. It is noteworthy that among the four small intestine parameters, 58% of the estimates based on 68 Zn tracer data had FSDs Ͼ0.5 but only 15% of the estimates from 67 Zn tracer data had high FSDs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding the numerical identifiability of the kinetic parameter estimates, Table 3 shows that there are six parameters that have at least one estimate with an FSD Ͼ0.5. Only two parameters, k (5,4) and k (10,9), exhibit poor estimate precision in Ն50% of cases. It is noteworthy that among the four small intestine parameters, 58% of the estimates based on 68 Zn tracer data had FSDs Ͼ0.5 but only 15% of the estimates from 67 Zn tracer data had high FSDs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the standard errors of the population parameter estimates reflect both the uncertainties of the individual estimates as well as the intersubject variability of the estimates, their interpretation as regards numerical identifiability is not straightforward. Furthermore, little formal work has been done regarding identifiability of population parameter data (5). Because the practical utility of the population model is dependent, in part, on the precision of the model parameters, it is encouraging that the fractional standard error values are generally Ͻ25%, especially given the heterogeneity and small size of the current population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%