2002
DOI: 10.1067/msy.2002.119361
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of angiogenesis with anti-CD105 immunostaining in the process of colorectal cancer development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

9
58
0
5

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
9
58
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Endoglin stained small vessels with high sensitivity in or around the tumor, but the blood vessels in nonneoplastic tissue did not or only weakly stained with endoglin. This is in agreement with previous studies where endoglin was expressed mainly in proliferating blood vessels, while CD34 or CD31 stained all the blood vessels, 21,22,24,31 suggesting that endoglin is preferentially expressed in vessels undergoing neoangiogenesis. Endoglin is very selective for the blood vessel endothelium and reacts specifically with endothelial cells without significant staining of inflammatory or stromal cells within the neoplasm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Endoglin stained small vessels with high sensitivity in or around the tumor, but the blood vessels in nonneoplastic tissue did not or only weakly stained with endoglin. This is in agreement with previous studies where endoglin was expressed mainly in proliferating blood vessels, while CD34 or CD31 stained all the blood vessels, 21,22,24,31 suggesting that endoglin is preferentially expressed in vessels undergoing neoangiogenesis. Endoglin is very selective for the blood vessel endothelium and reacts specifically with endothelial cells without significant staining of inflammatory or stromal cells within the neoplasm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In contrast, MVD identified by CD34 (and other pan-endothelial markers) may not be able to accurately characterise angiogenesis of certain types of tumour, leading to a lack of association of MVD with tumour progression. This speculation is supported by a recent study by Akagi et al (2002), who have reported that a significant increase of MVD determined by Mab to CD105 but not Mab to CD34 was observed from low-grade to high-grade dysplasia of colorectal mucosa, and from high-grade dysplasia to colorectal carcinoma. In conclusion, the ability to quantitatively discriminate between angiogenesis and pre-existing vessels in tumours seems to be an important determinant in the assessment of tumour angiogenesis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…To obtain MVD data, invariably, previous studies have used pan-endothelial antibodies, for example, against von Willebrand factor, CD31 or CD34, which although ideal for staining normal blood vessels, in our experience are inefficient in recognising angiogenic EC. In contrast, CD105 (endoglin) is abundantly expressed in angiogenic EC, and antibodies to it preferentially bind to EC of angiogenic tissues (Krupinski et al, 1994;Wang et al, 1994;Burrows et al, 1995;Bodey et al, 1998;Kumar et al, 1999;Brewer et al, 2000;Fonsatti et al, 2001;Akagi et al, 2002). Our hypothesis is that this selective immunostaining by an antibody to CD105, that is, its ability to distinguish tumour-associated EC and pre-existing vessels, will reduce the incidence of false-positive staining of normal entrapped vasculature in a cancerous mass (Thompson et al, 1987).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, endoglin appears to be a highly sensitive angiogenic marker in several malignancies. 13,[22][23][24]31 Several factors may be invoked to explain the endoglin staining pattern seen in the present study and not reported in TUR specimens. While this includes tissue processing, methodology, and analysis of different areas (normal/benign, PIN and cancer), the types of surgical specimens (whole-mount vs TUR) is likely in cause.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Such as superiority of endoglin over vWF but also CD31 and CD34 was reported in other tumors. 22,23,31 In TUR specimens, there was approximately 4-fold lower number of endoglin-vs vWF-stained tumor vessels. 13 Whether this discrepancy is due to differences in methods, cases, and use of whole mount vs TUR sections is unknown, but in both series, endoglinstained tumor microvessels (and vWF in the present series) correlated with Gleason score.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%