2019
DOI: 10.1111/ajag.12709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of appendicular skeletal muscle: Development and validation of anthropometric prediction equations in Chinese patients with knee osteoarthritis

Abstract: Objective To develop anthropometric prediction equations for estimating appendicular skeletal muscle (ASM) in Chinese knee osteoarthritis patients. Methods Subjects were divided into the model development group (MD group: 104 cases, 47 men and 57 women) and cross‐validation group (CV group: 69 cases, 38 men and 31 women). Stepwise multiple linear regression analyses were undertaken in the MD group to identify the best equations. Agreement between the estimated ASM and ASM measured by dual‐energy X‐ray absorpti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, no older people over 70 years old are involved in these studies. The equation developed by Wu et al 24 was based on older people with knee osteoarthritis. The equations proposed by Liu, 1 Chien, 25 Hsiao 20 et al were generalized from small sample size (140~510).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, no older people over 70 years old are involved in these studies. The equation developed by Wu et al 24 was based on older people with knee osteoarthritis. The equations proposed by Liu, 1 Chien, 25 Hsiao 20 et al were generalized from small sample size (140~510).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the inclusion of physical function in different studies has varying influence on the predictive accuracy of the model. 20 , 24 The estimating models of ASM were also developed in Chinese populations, but the studies had small sample sizes, 20 , 25 limited populations, 24 , 26 or lack of the validation of the evaluation method. 27 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation