2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10666-008-9150-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of Biogas Production Rate in a Thermophilic UASB Reactor Using Artificial Neural Networks

Abstract: Biogas production rate was modeled and estimated in a thermophilic upflow anaerobic sludge blanket digester. Data set covers a time period of both steady-state conditions and an abnormal operation condition, i.e., organic loading shocks. Multilayer neural networks topology was used as the modeling tool. Half of the experimental data were used for the training of the model and the remaining half were used for the testing stage. Model results were evaluated from the point of view of both steady conditions and ab… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Biogas production Biogas production rate was modeled and estimated in thermophilic UASB (Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket) reactor (Kanat and Saral, 2009). Experimental data cover stationary state period and period of unusual process conditions -organic substrate addition.…”
Section: Bioethanol Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biogas production Biogas production rate was modeled and estimated in thermophilic UASB (Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket) reactor (Kanat and Saral, 2009). Experimental data cover stationary state period and period of unusual process conditions -organic substrate addition.…”
Section: Bioethanol Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the planning stage of modeling and simulation-based studies, selection of the most appropriate model components is a crucial factor in order to recognize possible technical faults and to reduce computation time, as well as to develop an accurate modeling methodology for a specific environmental process (Yetilmezsoy et al, 2015;Kanat and Saral, 2009;Yetilmezsoy and Sapci-Zengin, 2009). For the present case, the model variables and their respective ranges were chosen in accordance with the relevant literature (Yetilmezsoy, 2010;Yetilmezsoy, 2016;142 YETILMEZSOY K. Orhon and Artan, 1994;Muslu, 1996a;Muslu, 1996b;Qasim, 1998;Crites and Tchobanoglous, 1998 ), X10 = Ta: ambient air temperature (°C), X11 = Ti: influent wastewater temperature (°C), X12 = H: static pressure caused by wastewater depth in the areation basin, measured in head of water (m), and X13 = Ha: elevation or altitude above sea level (m).…”
Section: Representation Of Input and Output Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is essential that the reactor contents provide enough buffer capacity to neutralize any eventual VFA accumulation and thus prevent build-up of localized acid zones in the digester [47]. In the process, the degradation of proteins in the wastewater by anaerobic treatment results in generation of alkalinity due to the reaction of ammonia with carbon dioxide and water [48,49].…”
Section: Vfa/alkalinity Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the process, the degradation of proteins in the wastewater by anaerobic treatment results in generation of alkalinity due to the reaction of ammonia with carbon dioxide and water [48,49]. However, at low initial alkalinity in the reactor, the decrease in pH will be larger at the increased VFA concentrations [47]. More importantly, high VFA concentrations can be detrimental particularly for the biological activity of the methanogens [50].…”
Section: Vfa/alkalinity Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%