2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2015.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of body fat in adults using a portable A-mode ultrasound

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
7

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
19
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…The gastrocnemius was selected for investigation because it is recruited during running and cycling (Zehr et al, 2007 ), it is therefore likely to undergo adaptations with training. NIRS measurements from this site have been shown to be reproducible (Southern et al, 2014 ) and since the calf is covered by less adipose tissue than the thigh or larger locomotive muscles (Bielemann et al, 2016 ) the influence of ATT on NIRS measurements is less (van Beekvelt et al, 2001 ). Prior to attaching the NIRS device, ATT was measured at the site of NIRS measurement using B-mode ultrasound (Vivid I, GE healthcare) equipped with a 12L-RS linear array transducer; three measurements were averaged.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gastrocnemius was selected for investigation because it is recruited during running and cycling (Zehr et al, 2007 ), it is therefore likely to undergo adaptations with training. NIRS measurements from this site have been shown to be reproducible (Southern et al, 2014 ) and since the calf is covered by less adipose tissue than the thigh or larger locomotive muscles (Bielemann et al, 2016 ) the influence of ATT on NIRS measurements is less (van Beekvelt et al, 2001 ). Prior to attaching the NIRS device, ATT was measured at the site of NIRS measurement using B-mode ultrasound (Vivid I, GE healthcare) equipped with a 12L-RS linear array transducer; three measurements were averaged.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, one study found that whole-body fat content in men could be predicted using information on thigh circumference, triceps and thigh skinfold thickness, biceps muscle thickness, weight, and height. [3] This is done using “multiple linear regression.” We will not discuss this more complex form of regression.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This discrepancy might result from the different gender used in the previous studies compared to our study. Previous studies have demonstrated that there was great variability in subcutaneous fat among women compared with men [29,30]. All subjects in the present study were men, while the previous studies had included both men and women (healthy subjects or patients) [27,28].…”
Section: Upper-leg 50% Girth Measurementmentioning
confidence: 84%