Estimation of CO 2 emissions from waste incinerators: Comparison of three methods

The introduction of a base component to porous organic salts and their CO2 storage capability

“…Moreover, when the pressure was decreased to below P e /P 0 = 0.05, DPPMA/MTBPS readily desorbed the adsorbed CO 2 . Therefore, DPPMA/MTBPS captured and retained CO 2 even at a relatively low CO 2 pressure of 0.08-0.13 atm, which is comparable to that of a waste incinerator 38 , or 0.05 atm, which is comparable to that of a natural gas combined cycle power station. 39 Therefore, the introduction of a functional component (even a base component) into the benzene rings of TPMA enables the void environment and the functionalities of POSs to be precisely designed.…”

Polyurethanes based on lignin-derived metabolic intermediate with strong adhesion to metals

“…14 Another problem is that these polymers are mainly made from petroleum, which increases the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere when incinerated at the time of disposal. [15][16][17] Biomass-based polymers, which are metabolized from plants and bacteria instead of petroleum, have been the focus of significant research interest for decades in order to achieve the social goal of carbon neutral, sustainable chemistry. [18][19][20] However, some biomass-based polymers made from food may face the problem of competition with agriculture, which makes the food supply unstable.…”

Carbon Capture, Transport and Storage (CCTS) supply chain assessment for early movers

“…[10] The CO2 content in the flue gas of waste incinerators varies between 7 and 10%. [11] For the capture stage, we assume the use of the mature amine-scrubbing technology and a capture rate of 90%. The costs are adapted from Feron et al [12] to the emission volume of the plant with the help of the exponent factors for cost-scale up of process equipment [13], and to the typical CO2 concentration in the flue gas of waste incinerators.…”