2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00603-017-1317-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of Crack Initiation and Propagation Thresholds of Confined Brittle Coal Specimens Based on Energy Dissipation Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
43
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
3
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Suppose c3 = 11MN/m, with respect to 2 = 7MN/m and c3 =8.6, 8.3, and 8 m 2 = 7MN/m and according to (5), (7), and (10), the support pressure curve 4 ( ) (x is the [8,10] m section) for the hardened zone of coal seam when 4 =8 m and c4 =2 m and the support pressure curve 3 ( ) (x is the [10,18] m section) for the softened zone of coal seam when 3 = 10m and c3 =8.6, 8.3, and 8 m were plotted by Matlab, as shown by curves 1, 2, and 3 in Figure 7. A horizontal tangent line is located at 3 = 10m on the support pressure curves.…”
Section: Expressions Of Support Pressures In Softened and Hardenedmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Suppose c3 = 11MN/m, with respect to 2 = 7MN/m and c3 =8.6, 8.3, and 8 m 2 = 7MN/m and according to (5), (7), and (10), the support pressure curve 4 ( ) (x is the [8,10] m section) for the hardened zone of coal seam when 4 =8 m and c4 =2 m and the support pressure curve 3 ( ) (x is the [10,18] m section) for the softened zone of coal seam when 3 = 10m and c3 =8.6, 8.3, and 8 m were plotted by Matlab, as shown by curves 1, 2, and 3 in Figure 7. A horizontal tangent line is located at 3 = 10m on the support pressure curves.…”
Section: Expressions Of Support Pressures In Softened and Hardenedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a hard roof with advanced fracture, when the working face advances to below the roof fracture line, if the supporting resistance of frame and friction between seams are insufficient, the roof easily subsides in a stepped style, causing collapse accidents under pressure and even rock burst disasters. Many studies have been conducted on the deformation, law of motion, and fracture of a hard roof under the overlying load by field observation, similar material simulation, numerical simulation, and theoretical analysis [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Qian et al [15,16], Miao et al [17], and Li et al [18] analyzed a hard roof by assuming the support pressure relationship between coal seam and immediate roof as an elastic foundation and obtained some basic results such as the deflection solution for a hard roof and the maximum bending moment in the front of a coal wall and for an advanced roof fracture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have been performed using different methods to estimate the energy evolution due to excavation . Some researchers have analyzed the energy change with in situ investigations based on feedback analysis of acoustic emissions and microseismic and stresses .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have been performed using different methods to estimate the energy evolution due to excavation. [10][11][12][13] Some researchers have analyzed the energy change with in situ investigations based on feedback analysis of acoustic emissions and microseismic and stresses. [14][15][16] Their results indicate that energy changes due to excavation are associated with in situ stress, geological and geotechnical conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that confining pressure had a significant influence on the cyclic dynamic deformation and fatigue damage evolution, and with increasing confining pressure, the axial strain at failure increased as did the residual volumetric strain at the initiation of dilatancy. Ning et al 21 experimentally investigated the stress-strain relations and energy evolution characteristics of coal samples under cyclic loading-unloading triaxial compression and introduced a new energy-dissipation method to identify crack initiation and propagation thresholds. Zuo et al 18,19 analyzed the failure behavior and axial crack recovery effect of coal-rock combination bodies under different stress levels of cyclic loading-unloading.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%