2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10845-013-0798-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of cutting speed in abrasive water jet using an adaptive wavelet neural network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Erkan, Demetgül, Işik, and Tansel (2014) used the Taguchi method and GONNs (Genetically Optimized Neural Network systems) to analyze the discrete data of abrasive flow and the fuzzy selection of waterjet parameters; Zain, Haron, and Sharif (2011) employed the ANN (Artificial Neural Network) and annealing approaches to predict the optimal process parameters of flow models. Ergur and Oysal (2015) studied on the fuzzy optimization of waterjet machining, and the estimation of cutting speed in abrasive waterjet either. Furthermore, Shabgard, Badamchizadeh, Ranjbary, and Amini (2013) investigated the fuzzy predictions of material removal rate, tool wear ratio, and surface roughness, with typical flow models were carefully considered about.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Erkan, Demetgül, Işik, and Tansel (2014) used the Taguchi method and GONNs (Genetically Optimized Neural Network systems) to analyze the discrete data of abrasive flow and the fuzzy selection of waterjet parameters; Zain, Haron, and Sharif (2011) employed the ANN (Artificial Neural Network) and annealing approaches to predict the optimal process parameters of flow models. Ergur and Oysal (2015) studied on the fuzzy optimization of waterjet machining, and the estimation of cutting speed in abrasive waterjet either. Furthermore, Shabgard, Badamchizadeh, Ranjbary, and Amini (2013) investigated the fuzzy predictions of material removal rate, tool wear ratio, and surface roughness, with typical flow models were carefully considered about.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%