ABSTRACT. The lack of transferability of the Cropanopy temperature measured with infrared thermometers is often promoted as a basis for irrigation scheduling (Geiser et al., 1982;Stanghellini and Lorenzi, 1994;Wanjura and Upchurch, 1996;Wanjura and Upchurch, 2000;Wanjura et al., 2003;Bockhold et al., 2003;Colaizzi et al., 2003). Although this technology has a long history of development, it is yet to be adopted by farmers to schedule irrigations. Wolpert (1962) was among the first to study the factors affecting canopy temperature, using a theoretical mathematical representation of all the variables important to the heat balance of a plant leaf. Gates (1964) and Linacre (1964) recognized that transpiration was an important factor controlling leaf temperature, as it acts as a cooling mechanism. At that time, canopy temperature was measured using thermocouples embedded in the leaves, which was not very practical for general use. The use of infrared thermometers to measure canopy temperature, however, was becoming feasible (Conaway and van Bavel, 1967;Fuchs and Tanner, 1966). Carlson et al. (1972) recognized that canopy temperature provided a measure of the plant response to its environment and suggested that the factors affecting canopy temperature were the same ones affecting evapotranspiration. These factors included wind speed, solar radiation, air temperature, vapor pressure deficit, and soil moisture.Linking canopy temperature to soil moisture was particularly important since the potential of using canopy temperature as an indicator of crop water stress and as a tool for irrigation scheduling was then recognized. The basic assumption was that transpiration cools the leaves and as available soil moisture decreases, transpiration is reduced and, therefore, the temperature of the leaves increases. Considerable research followed, trying to use canopy temperature as a tool for irrigation scheduling, and many indexes were developed to relate canopy temperature to crop water stress Jackson et al., 1977;Blad et al., 1981). Ehrler (1973) made the seminal observation that canopy minus air temperature (T c − T a ) was lineally related to air vapor pressure deficit (VPD) and Ehrler et al. (1978) demonstrated that (T c − T a ) was a reliable indicator of plant water stress by relating it to measured plant water potential. Idso et al. (1981) realized that lower and upper baselines could be established empirically for both non-water-stressed and for non-transpiring crop conditions, respectively. They used these baselines to calculate what they called the Crop C