2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.06.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of dew yield from radiative condensers by means of an energy balance model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dew harvest in temperate with dry winter climate results are comparable to some those obtained from Mediterranean places with hot-dry climates, as is shown in experimental studies. The yearly average daily dew harvest ranged from 36.7 to 57.7 g/m 2 for the Mediterranean climate cases, as is shown by Maestre-Valero [16,18]. The average seasonal daily dew harvest was 33 and 36 g/m 2 for hot-dry weather according to Nilson et al [4] and Mileta [14].…”
Section: Monthly and Winter Dew Harvestmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The dew harvest in temperate with dry winter climate results are comparable to some those obtained from Mediterranean places with hot-dry climates, as is shown in experimental studies. The yearly average daily dew harvest ranged from 36.7 to 57.7 g/m 2 for the Mediterranean climate cases, as is shown by Maestre-Valero [16,18]. The average seasonal daily dew harvest was 33 and 36 g/m 2 for hot-dry weather according to Nilson et al [4] and Mileta [14].…”
Section: Monthly and Winter Dew Harvestmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Gandhidasan and Abualhamayel [9] report a dew harvest rate of 0.22 mm/night from January to February in Dhahran, Saudi Arabia, with an agreement of 14.3% between the theoretical and experimental results. On the other hand, Maestre-Valero et al [18] report 17.4 mm/night and 20.8 mm/night of dew harvest for one year, using white standard foil and black foil, with a Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), of 0.051 mm, and 0.053 mm, respectively. The RMSE represents the sample standard deviation of the differences between predicted values and observed values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, due to the effects of gap-filling in rainy days (Kang et al, 2012), dews (Maestre-Valero et al, 2012), and fogs (Beiderwieden et al, 2008;Eugster et al, 2006), the measured ET may be underestimated. Second, the underestimated ET caused by gap-filling in rainy days (Kang et al, 2012), dews (Maestre-Valero et al, 2012), and fogs (Beiderwieden et al, 2008;Eugster et al, 2006) may overestimate T/ET. Third, during days with open canopy, the low temperature (Shi et al, 2008a) caused small measured water vapor fluxes below the canopy, which made the measured T (the difference between two layers water vapor fluxes) and T/ET overestimated.…”
Section: Model Performances and Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, although the environment (tropical, dry, temperate, continental) and sky view will be the same for any condensers at the same location, the precise shape and materials of the condenser do matter, in particular its infra-red emissivity, shape and thermal characteristics. Standard planar condensers of 1m × 1m collection area, inclined 30° from horizontal (which enable water collection by gravity) and thermally insulated from below are currently used (Berkowicz, 2007;Jacobs et al, 2008;Maestre-Valero et al, 2012, Sharan, 2006Lekouch et al, 2012). Their yield can vary by at least 20% at the same location depending on their orientation as regards to wind direction and nearby obstacles (Lekouch et al, 2012;Clus et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%