2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2011.00782.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of Direct Effects for Survival Data by using the Aalen Additive Hazards Model

Abstract: We extend the definition of the controlled direct effect of a point exposure on a survival outcome, other than through some given, time-fixed intermediate variable, to the additive hazard scale. We propose two-stage estimators for this effect when the exposure is dichotomous and randomly assigned and when the association between the intermediate variable and the survival outcome is confounded only by measured factors, which may themselves be affected by the exposure. The first stage of the estimation procedure… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous other methods have been developed (1,2,9,13,24,26,35,58), which we could not address in this article. Some of these are discussed in the book length treatment of mediation (47).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous other methods have been developed (1,2,9,13,24,26,35,58), which we could not address in this article. Some of these are discussed in the book length treatment of mediation (47).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, there is some evidence that HAART also has beneficial effects that are not mediated through virus suppression, i.e. direct effects in our context (Lu and Andrieu, 2000; Monini et al. , 2003; Bernstein and Dennis, 2008).…”
Section: Direct and Indirect Effects–mediationmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…If we substitute the counterfactual survival indicators S k , g =( R̄ m , 0 ) = 1 − R k , g =( R̄ m , 0 ) and S k , g =( R̄ m −1 , 0 ) = 1 − R k , g =( R̄ m −1 , 0 ) for R k , g =( R̄ m , 0 ) and S k , g =( R̄ m −1 , 0 ) in Eq (1), we obtain the structural nested multiplicative survival time model (SNMSTM) considered by Martinussen et al (2011, p. 776). We chose to fit an SNCFTM rather than a SNMSTM because, with rare failures, unconstrained estimation of an SNMSTM may result in estimated survival probabilities exceeding 1.…”
Section: Structural Nested Cumulative Failure Time Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%