2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.seares.2014.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of dynamic energy budget parameters for the Mediterranean toothcarp (Aphanius fasciatus)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, coefficients reported in the present study are in agreement with ranges proposed for A. fasciatus by Leonardos & Sinis (1999). As reported by Leonardos et al (1996), Leonardos & Sinis (1999), Cavraro et al (2014a) and Rinaldi et al (2014), a pronounced energy investment in somatic growth is observed in young organisms, followed by a decrease after the first age when specimens reach sexual maturation and slow down growth to cope with reproduction. Sex ratio (2.37) favors females and was similar to values observed for killifish during the reproductive period by Penaz & Zaki (1985), Leonardos & Sinis (1999) and Annabi et al (2013); interestingly, Mordenti et al (2008) and Alcaraz, Gholami, Esmaeili and García-Berthou (2015) found lower values, although the sex ratio was again in favor of females.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…On the other hand, coefficients reported in the present study are in agreement with ranges proposed for A. fasciatus by Leonardos & Sinis (1999). As reported by Leonardos et al (1996), Leonardos & Sinis (1999), Cavraro et al (2014a) and Rinaldi et al (2014), a pronounced energy investment in somatic growth is observed in young organisms, followed by a decrease after the first age when specimens reach sexual maturation and slow down growth to cope with reproduction. Sex ratio (2.37) favors females and was similar to values observed for killifish during the reproductive period by Penaz & Zaki (1985), Leonardos & Sinis (1999) and Annabi et al (2013); interestingly, Mordenti et al (2008) and Alcaraz, Gholami, Esmaeili and García-Berthou (2015) found lower values, although the sex ratio was again in favor of females.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…LT values showed wide overlapping ranges among age classes, in agreement with Leonardos & Sinis (1999), probably due to the A. fasciatus reproduction strategy, whose phases occur several times over the summer months. With regards to the growth of A. fasciatus within the studied area, regression models obtained for males and females did not differ significantly, in contrast with Penaz & Zaki (1985), Annabi et al (2013) and Rinaldi et al (2014). On the other hand, coefficients reported in the present study are in agreement with ranges proposed for A. fasciatus by Leonardos & Sinis (1999).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When the focus is on the entire life cycle, and provided the assumptions of standard DEB theory apply, a DEB model would have fewer parameters than common bioenergetics models. DEB theory has been used to answer different questions in ecology of fishes: management in fisheries (Jusup, Klanjscek, Matsuda, & Kooijman, ), prediction of the growth and reproduction during spawning migration (Einarsson, Birnir, & Sigurosson, ; Pecquerie, Petitgas, & Kooijman, ) or under different environmental conditions (Rinaldi et al., ), and comparison of life strategies between species (Freitas et al., ; Pecquerie, Johnson, Kooijman, & Nisbet, ; van der Veer, Kooijman, & van der Meer, ). Moreover, nesting a DEB model within a population dynamics model provides realistic descriptions and predictions of population dynamics, especially when populations are facing food limitations (Beaudouin et al., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…nl/thb/deb/deblab/debtool/) was used to estimate the DEB parameter values for Perna. This method employs the simultaneous minimization of weighted sum of squared deviations between a number of data sets and model predictions in a single-step procedure (Rinaldi et al 2014). When no empirical data were available, the covariate method was applied using parameters estimated from closely related species (Saraiva et al 2014).…”
Section: Deb Datamentioning
confidence: 99%