1976
DOI: 10.1148/120.3.683
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of Fetal Dose to Patients Undergoing Diagnostic X-Ray Procedures

Abstract: The estimation of fetal dose incurred by patients undergoing various radiologic procedures can be very perplexing. The problem is especially critical for women who do not know that they are pregnant at the time of x-ray exposure. A desciption is offered of efforts to quantitate the fetal dose by after-the-fact calculations. Such conservatively employed calculations may be essential for a clinical decision regarding therapeutic abortion.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, whereas the calculations are likely to be valid for our institution, an independent determination of the expected absorbed dose to the fetus is essential for each facility in which x-ray procedures on pregnant patients are being contemplated. Calculation of the expected absorbed dose to the fetus can be made as described in this work or elsewhere (9,10,45). The calculated fetal exposure from the diagnostic procedures are similar to those reported in the studies evaluating the risks of in utero exposure to low level radiation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, whereas the calculations are likely to be valid for our institution, an independent determination of the expected absorbed dose to the fetus is essential for each facility in which x-ray procedures on pregnant patients are being contemplated. Calculation of the expected absorbed dose to the fetus can be made as described in this work or elsewhere (9,10,45). The calculated fetal exposure from the diagnostic procedures are similar to those reported in the studies evaluating the risks of in utero exposure to low level radiation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Previous reports give evidence that the absorbed dose to the fetus is negligible for x-ray exposures whose primary beam geometrical borders are more than 10 cm from the fetal area (10). For the three antero-posterior tibia/fibula views, there was no organ dose table available and the fetal absorbed dose was estimated at less than 0.001 rads.…”
Section: Contrast Venographymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Other reports have appeared in the literature concerning gonad doses (Billings et al, 1957;Laughlin et al, 1957;Johns & Wilson, 1958;Epp et al, 1963;Adrian Committee, 1966;Yoshinaga et al, 1967;Antoku & Russell, 1971), bone marrow dose (Laughlin et al, 1957;Epp et al, 1963;Luizzi et al, 1964;Yoshinaga et al, 1967;Antoku & Russell, 1971), and thyroid dose (Bhatnagar et al, 1981). The importance of minimising fetal dosage in obstetric examinations has also long been appreciated (Bewley et al, 1957;Clayton et al, 1957;Baker et al, 1979;Jacobson & Conley, 1976;Rugh, 1963a,b;Axelsson & Ohlsen, 1979). As in radiotherapy, the dose to the skin surface on the central axis of the X-ray beam is a useful parameter, because it is comparatively easy to measure (which facilitates interdepartmental comparison), and it is useful as a starting point for estimating doses to internal organs.…”
Section: The Site Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another method is to estimate the dose by calculation by the methods described elsewhere (Ja76,HEW76,NCRP77b). It is desirable to compare measured dose with calculated or published values.…”
Section: Dose Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%