2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.proenv.2011.07.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of forest stand volume, tree density and biodiversity using Landsat ETM+Data, comparison of linear and regression tree analyses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, the study area selected for the T. grandis were incorporated under a single agro-climatic zone in respective of the tree species. The similar technique of multiple linear regression models was used by Mohammadi et al (2011) to estimate the forest stand volume and tree density. By using the biometric attributes, carbon yield model for T. grandis plantations of Cauvery delta zone was constructed using multiple linear regression, Y = -113.001 + 2.8616X 1 -3.6946X 2 + 1245.813X 3 Tree diameter, tree height and age of the T. grandis trees were selected as the independent explanatory variables to predict the dependent variable of carbon.…”
Section: Carbon Yield Model and Carbon Yield Table For T Grandismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the study area selected for the T. grandis were incorporated under a single agro-climatic zone in respective of the tree species. The similar technique of multiple linear regression models was used by Mohammadi et al (2011) to estimate the forest stand volume and tree density. By using the biometric attributes, carbon yield model for T. grandis plantations of Cauvery delta zone was constructed using multiple linear regression, Y = -113.001 + 2.8616X 1 -3.6946X 2 + 1245.813X 3 Tree diameter, tree height and age of the T. grandis trees were selected as the independent explanatory variables to predict the dependent variable of carbon.…”
Section: Carbon Yield Model and Carbon Yield Table For T Grandismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The precision and cost of estimating sample tree volume is improved by variance reduction using the knowledge contained in taper functions (Li and Weisktteli, 2010). Basically, there is always a sectional area and cumulative volume at any height up the tree since the taper model predicts the tree's shape (Mohammadia et al 2011;Weiskittel, 2010). A sample height on the tree is selected and the bole measured.…”
Section: Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Post-fire management decisions and restoration actions taken by forestry managers are largely context-dependent (Taboada et al, 2017) because post-fire vegetation recovery depends on pre-fire vegetation community composition, fire regime and climatic factors of each specific site across large spatial scales (Puig-Gironès et al, 2017). The search for new tools that may facilitate decision-making and reduce field data gathering efforts in forest management has been one of the most important aspects in recent years (Wulder et al, 2005;Mohammadi et al, 2011;Meng et al, 2016), since most of management decisions require accurate data at short-term to be applied (Schmidt et al, 2018). For that reason, these tools should allow the transfer of predictive relations from the information obtained in different geographical or climatic contexts (Foody et al, 2003;Cutler et al, 2012).…”
Section: Post-fire Vegetation Recovery Tools: Importance Of Spectral and Textural Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%