2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106451
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of gear SN curve for tooth root bending fatigue by means of maximum likelihood method and statistic of extremes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the one hand, the lack of the rolling/sliding condition implies that the loading condition occurring within the toot root is different [11,54,55]. On the other hand, the fact that the tests are performed on the teeth rather that gear implies a statistical difference [17,18]. Therefore, the results of STBF test have to be corrected in order to be used for the assessment of a gear pair under the real case loading scenario.…”
Section: Gear Testing For Tooth Root Bending Fatiguementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the one hand, the lack of the rolling/sliding condition implies that the loading condition occurring within the toot root is different [11,54,55]. On the other hand, the fact that the tests are performed on the teeth rather that gear implies a statistical difference [17,18]. Therefore, the results of STBF test have to be corrected in order to be used for the assessment of a gear pair under the real case loading scenario.…”
Section: Gear Testing For Tooth Root Bending Fatiguementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This article is aimed at continuing some previous works of the authors [17,18]. There, the statistical framework is based on [19,20], where a curve without fatigue limit is proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Moreover, depending on the failure origin, the models for the fatigue life should also consider the mechanisms of crack nucleation [7][8][9][10][11]. However, due to randomness associated with the fatigue phenomenon, the large experimental scatter should be properly modelled and taken into account when the S-N relationship is assessed [1,2,5,[12][13][14]. Otherwise, a safe design is not guaranteed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, studies recommend that the S-N curve should be shaped by considering run-outs because runouts simply indicate the absence of failure [20]. The maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) approach is considered to be effective to make a combined evaluation of the failed and the run-out specimens [23,24], and has been applied to shape the S-N curves of some fatigueprone details in literature [25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%