2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41893-018-0167-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of global recoverable human and animal faecal biomass

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
109
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
109
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Humans and their domesticated animals constitute approximately 96–98% of the global terrestrial mammalian biomass . The fecal matter associated with such huge populations has been estimated to be increasing by over 52 billion kilograms per year since 2003; and the total fecal matter produced is expected to reach at least 4.6 trillion kilograms per year by 2030 . Food animals, particularly cattle, chickens, and sheep, produce about four times more fecal matter than humans, which implies that appropriate fecal matter management in food animal systems must be globally influential.…”
Section: Complexity Of Antimicrobial Resistance Across Domesticated Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Humans and their domesticated animals constitute approximately 96–98% of the global terrestrial mammalian biomass . The fecal matter associated with such huge populations has been estimated to be increasing by over 52 billion kilograms per year since 2003; and the total fecal matter produced is expected to reach at least 4.6 trillion kilograms per year by 2030 . Food animals, particularly cattle, chickens, and sheep, produce about four times more fecal matter than humans, which implies that appropriate fecal matter management in food animal systems must be globally influential.…”
Section: Complexity Of Antimicrobial Resistance Across Domesticated Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 One reason for the poor efficacy of low-cost WASH interventions is their requirement for high user adherence to consistent sustained behaviour change. For rural people in low-income countries, environmental hygiene requires not only widespread access to and use of improved sanitation, but also management of faeces from cohabitating domestic animals which makes up 67% of the household-level faecal mass; 6 hand hygiene requires prioritisation of scarce resources to purchase soap, spending hours each day collecting large volumes of water, and then prioritising these resources for handwashing; and clean drinking water might require households to purchase and mix chlorination solutions with measured volumes of water in designated clean covered containers, and be willing to drink water they find unpalatable.…”
Section: Reducing the User Burden In Wash Interventions For Low-incommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through the ROC curve, we demonstrated the hCYTB484 marker to be widely distributed in individual human feces in concentrations above the aLLoQ, indicating that the hCYTB484 marker is potentially useful in detecting human fecal sludges and other concentrated fecal waste streams where fewer individuals contribute to the waste. Such matrices are the most common form of fecal wastes globally where risks of exposure are highest (12).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the global human population does not have access to sewered sanitation: an estimated 56% of households globally have unsewered sanitation facilities and 12% of households globally have no sanitation facility (12). Furthermore, disproportionalities in sanitation exist: the same geographic regions that contain the lowest rates of sewered households are where most of the human population live and where the most human feces are produced (12). This means that for much of the world’s population, enteric pathogen exposure risks are related to sludges and other non-wastewater fecal waste streams that are composites of feces from relatively few individuals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%