2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11629-011-2106-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of ground deformation caused by the earthquake (M7.2) in Japan, 2008, from the geomorphic image analysis of high resolution LiDAR DEMs

Abstract: In this study, a new method for quantitative and efficient measurement for the ground surface movement was developed. The feature of this technique is to identify geomorphic characteristics by image matching analysis, using the intelligent images made from high resolution DEM(Digital Elevation Model). This method is useful to extract the small ground displacement where the surface shape was not intensely deformed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resultant discontinuity in displacements across the Sanhazama river may reflect (1) shallow faulting along the trend of the river channel or (2) NE-directed slumping of the southern flank of the Sanhazama valley. Superficially, our horizontal displacement field resembles the one obtained from particle image velocimetry (Mukoyama, 2012).…”
Section: Iwate-miyagi Lidar Differencingsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The resultant discontinuity in displacements across the Sanhazama river may reflect (1) shallow faulting along the trend of the river channel or (2) NE-directed slumping of the southern flank of the Sanhazama valley. Superficially, our horizontal displacement field resembles the one obtained from particle image velocimetry (Mukoyama, 2012).…”
Section: Iwate-miyagi Lidar Differencingsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…A "sliding window" approach -coupled with careful filtering -could potentially be used to remove some of the noise, and other variants of ICP could also be tested (e.g., Rusinkiewicz and Levoy, 2001), including ones which incorporate spot height errors (Glennie et al, 2014). Other topography differencing techniques are also available including DEM pixel tracking (Leprince et al, 2012), point cloud cross-correlation (Borsa and Minster, 2012), and particle image velocimetry (Mukoyama, 2012;Aryal et al, 2012). There is potential in all of these methods to include the intensity values of the lidar returns as an additional constraint on horizontal displacements -as discussed by Borsa and Minster (2012) -although this adaptation is perhaps best suited to areas with sparser vegetation than in our Japan examples.…”
Section: Technical Issues With Respect To Lidar Differencingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After removal of vegetation and other erroneous points, a 2D-3D displacement field can be obtained directly with a 3D piecewise Iter-1020 ative Closest Point (ICP) operation (Besl and McKay, 1992;Teza et al, 2007;Nissen et al, 2012), point cloud cross-correlation (Borsa and Minster, 2012), or with 2D correlation techniques (PIV) applied to a 2.5D DTM (Aryal et al, 2012;Mukoyama, 2012). Distance and volume can be quantified directly with a 3D cloud to cloud distance calculation (Lague et al, 2013), or with cloud to mesh 1025 comparisons (Rosser et al, 2005;Day et al, 2013a), or vertical subtraction of gridded data (Lane and Chandler, 2003;Wheaton et al, 2010;Schurch et al, 2011;Wheaton et al, 2013;Pelletier and Orem, 2014).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method has now advanced beyond those experiments to a modern digital image co-registration and correlation technique. As a sensitive change detection technique, it is effective in geotechnical studies using close range photography and with the growth of LiDAR has been used in the field to study deformation after earthquakes and from landslides (Aryal et al, 2015(Aryal et al, , 2012Mukoyama, 2011). However, using 3D point clouds presents its own problems.…”
Section: Change Detection Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%