2022
DOI: 10.5194/egusphere-egu22-8196
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of groundwater mean residence times in a near-surface aquifer using different natural tracers (Radon-222, Sulfur-35, Tritium, and δ18O)

Abstract: <p>The residence time of groundwater is an essential parameter for water resource management. In the presented study, environmental tracers (Rn-222, S-35, H-3, <em>δ</em><sup>18</sup>O) and hydrogeochemical groundwater components are used for assessing groundwater mean residence times in a near surface aquifer.</p><p>At a barrage station at the River Moselle, four groundwater monitoring wells and two … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, the high‐resolution tritium sampling of river water likely ensured to capture well short‐term tritium variations at both sampling locations; and (ii) the temporary storage of tritium at barrages. At Lehmen, the aquifer was predominantly recharged by surface water and the groundwater mean residence times varied between 5 and 6 months based on δ 18 O (Schmidt, Engel, et al, 2022). This lag time would likely be compensated within the quarterly scale of inventory calculation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, the high‐resolution tritium sampling of river water likely ensured to capture well short‐term tritium variations at both sampling locations; and (ii) the temporary storage of tritium at barrages. At Lehmen, the aquifer was predominantly recharged by surface water and the groundwater mean residence times varied between 5 and 6 months based on δ 18 O (Schmidt, Engel, et al, 2022). This lag time would likely be compensated within the quarterly scale of inventory calculation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%